Caligula | |
---|---|
Theatrical release poster |
|
Directed by |
|
Screenplay by |
|
Story by | Gore Vidal (original screenplay) |
Based on | Life of Caligula |
Produced by |
|
Starring |
|
Cinematography | Silvano Ippoliti |
Edited by |
|
Music by |
|
Production |
|
Distributed by |
|
Release dates |
|
Running time |
156 minutes |
Countries |
|
Languages |
|
Budget | $17.5 million[9] |
Box office | $23.4 million[10] |
Caligula (Italian: Caligola) is a 1979 erotic historical drama film focusing on the rise and fall of the Roman Emperor Caligula. The film stars Malcolm McDowell in the title role, alongside Teresa Ann Savoy, Helen Mirren, Peter O’Toole, John Steiner and John Gielgud. Producer Bob Guccione, the founder of Penthouse magazine, intended to produce an erotic feature film narrative with high production values and name actors.
Gore Vidal originated the idea for a film about the controversial Roman emperor and produced a draft screenplay under the working title Gore Vidal’s Caligula. The director, Tinto Brass, extensively altered Vidal’s original screenplay, however, leading Vidal to disavow the film. The final screenplay focuses on the idea that «absolute power corrupts absolutely». The producers did not allow Brass to edit the film, and changed its tone and style significantly, adding graphic unsimulated sex scenes featuring Penthouse Pets as extras filmed in post-production by Guccione and Giancarlo Lui. Brass had refused to film those sequences, as both he and Vidal disagreed with their inclusion. The version of the film released in Italian cinemas in 1979 and in American cinemas the following year, disregarded Brass’s intentions to present the film as a political satire, prompting him to disavow the film as well.[11]
Caligula‘s release was met with legal issues and controversies over its violent and sexual content; multiple cut versions were released worldwide, while its uncut form remains banned in several countries.[12] Despite the generally negative reception, with some critics also citing it among the worst movies ever made, the film is considered to be a cult classic[13] with significant merit for its political content and historical portrayal.[14]
The script was later adapted into a novelisation written by William Johnston under the pseudonym William Howard.[15] In 2018, Penthouse announced that a new Director’s Cut of the film was being edited by Alexander Tuschinski, with the approval of Brass’s family.[16] No release date for that cut has been confirmed. In 2020, another version of the film was announced to be released in the fall of that year, edited by author and historian Thomas Negovan to follow more closely Gore Vidal’s original screenplay instead of Tinto Brass’s or Bob Guccione’s vision.[17]
Plot[edit]
Caligula is the young heir to the throne of his great uncle, the Emperor Tiberius. One morning, a blackbird flies into his room; Caligula considers this a bad omen. Shortly afterward, one of the heads of the Praetorian Guard, Naevius Sutorius Macro, tells Caligula that Tiberius demands his immediate presence at Capri, where the Emperor lives with his close friend Nerva, dim-witted relative Claudius, and Caligula’s adopted son (Tiberius’s grandson) Gemellus. Fearing assassination, Caligula is afraid to leave but his sister and lover Drusilla persuades him to go.
At Capri, Caligula finds that Tiberius has become depraved, showing signs of advanced venereal diseases, and embittered with Rome and politics. Tiberius enjoys swimming with naked youths and watching degrading sex shows that include deformed people and animals. Caligula observes with fascination and horror. Tensions rise when Tiberius tries to poison Caligula in front of Gemellus. Nerva commits suicide and Caligula tries to kill Tiberius but loses his nerve. Proving his loyalty to Caligula, Macro kills Tiberius instead with Gemellus as a witness.
After Tiberius’ death and burial, Caligula is proclaimed the new Emperor, then proclaims Drusilla as his equal, to the apparent disgust of the Roman Senate. Drusilla, fearful of Macro’s influence, persuades Caligula to get rid of him. Caligula sets up a mock trial in which Gemellus is intimidated into testifying that Macro murdered Tiberius, then has Macro’s wife Ennia banished from Rome. After Macro is executed in a gruesome public game, Caligula appoints Tiberius’ former adviser Longinus as his personal assistant while pronouncing the docile Senator Chaerea as the new head of the Praetorian Guard.
Drusilla tries to find Caligula a wife among the priestesses of the goddess Isis, the cult they secretly practice. Caligula wants to marry Drusilla, but she insists they cannot marry because she is his sister. Instead, Caligula marries Caesonia, a priestess and notorious courtesan, after she bears him an heir. Drusilla reluctantly supports their marriage. Meanwhile, despite Caligula’s popularity with the masses, the Senate expresses disapproval for what initially seem to be light eccentricities. Darker aspects of Caligula’s personality emerge when he rapes a bride and groom on their wedding day in a minor fit of jealousy and orders Gemellus’s execution to provoke a reaction from Drusilla.
After discovering that Caesonia is pregnant, Caligula develops a severe fever. Drusilla nurses him back to health. Just as he fully recovers, Caesonia bears him a daughter, Julia Drusilla. During the celebration, Drusilla collapses with the same fever he had had. Soon afterward, Caligula receives another ill omen in the form of a blackbird. Despite his praying to Isis out of desperation, Drusilla dies from her fever. Initially unable to accept her death, Caligula has a nervous breakdown and rampages through the palace, destroying a statue of Isis while clutching Drusilla’s body.
Now in a deep depression, Caligula walks the Roman streets disguised as a beggar; he causes a disturbance after watching an amateur performance mocking his relationship with Drusilla. After a brief stay in a city gaol, Caligula proclaims himself a god and becomes determined to destroy the senatorial class, which he has come to loathe. The new reign he leads becomes a series of humiliations against the foundations of Rome—senators’ wives are forced to work in the service of the state as prostitutes, estates are confiscated, the old religion is desecrated, and the army is made to embark on a mock invasion of Britain. Unable to further tolerate his actions, Longinus conspires with Chaerea to assassinate Caligula.
Caligula enters his bedroom where a nervous Caesonia awaits him. Another blackbird appears but only Caesonia is frightened of it. The next morning, after rehearsing an Egyptian play, Caligula and his family are attacked in a coup headed by Chaerea. Caesonia and Julia are murdered, and Chaerea stabs Caligula in the stomach. With his final breath, the Emperor defiantly whimpers «I live!» as Caligula and his family’s bodies are thrown down the stadium’s steps and their blood is washed off the marble floor. Claudius witnesses the entire ordeal and is horrified even after being proclaimed Emperor by the Praetorian Guard.
Cast[edit]
- Malcolm McDowell as Caligula
- Teresa Ann Savoy as Drusilla
- Guido Mannari as Macro
- Patrick Allen as Macro (English dub voice) (uncredited)[3]
- John Gielgud as Nerva
- Peter O’Toole as Tiberius
- Giancarlo Badessi as Claudius
- Bruno Brive as Gemellus
- Adriana Asti as Ennia
- Leopoldo Trieste as Charicles
- Paolo Bonacelli as Cassius Chaerea
- Joss Ackland as Cassius Chaerea (English dub voice) (uncredited)
- John Steiner as Longinus
- Mirella D’Angelo as Livilla
- Helen Mirren as Caesonia
- Richard Parets as Mnester
- Paula Mitchell as Subura Singer
- Osiride Pevarello as Giant
- Donato Placido as Proculus
- Anneka Di Lorenzo as Messalina
- Lori Wagner as Agrippina
- Valerie Rae Clark as Imperial Brothel Worker
- Susanne Saxon as Imperial Brothel Worker
- Jane Hargrave as Imperial Brothel Worker
- Carolyn Patsis as Imperial Brothel Worker
- Bonnie Dee Wilson as Imperial Brothel Worker
Production[edit]
Development[edit]
Gore Vidal was paid $200,000 to write the screenplay for Caligula;[18] ultimately, the film credited no official screenwriter, only that it was «adapted from a screenplay» by Vidal.
The men’s magazine Penthouse had long been involved in film funding, helping invest in films made by other studios, including Chinatown, The Longest Yard and The Day of the Locust, but it had never produced a film on its own.[18] The magazine’s founder Bob Guccione wanted to produce an explicit adult film within a feature film narrative that had high production values; he decided to produce a film about the rise and fall of the Roman emperor Caligula.[19] Development began under producer Franco Rossellini, the nephew of filmmaker Roberto Rossellini.[18] A screenplay was written by Lina Wertmüller, but Guccione rejected Wertmüller’s script and paid Gore Vidal to write a new screenplay.[20] Vidal’s script had a strong focus on homosexuality, leading Guccione to demand rewrites which toned down the homosexual content for wider audience appeal. Guccione was concerned that Vidal’s script contained several homosexual sex scenes and only one scene of heterosexual sex, which was between Caligula and his sister Drusilla.[20][21] Vidal was paid US$200,000 for his screenplay, which was titled Gore Vidal’s Caligula.[18]
Elaborate sets were built by production designer Danilo Donati, who also designed the film’s costumes, jewelry, hairstyles, wigs, and makeup.[18] Several mainstream actors were cast, Guccione intending to make a film that he felt, like Citizen Kane, would be a landmark in cinematic history.[21] Guccione offered directing duties to John Huston and Lina Wertmüller, both of whom rejected the film.[18] After viewing scenes from the film Salon Kitty, Guccione agreed to have lunch with that film’s director Tinto Brass, believing Brass would be the ideal person to direct Caligula.[21] Brass had a reputation for being difficult to deal with on film sets but Guccione thought the film’s epic scope would «keep [Brass] in line» and that Brass understood the concept of the film enough to direct it.[18] Brass described Vidal’s screenplay as «the work of an aging arteriosclerotic» and agreed to direct only if he was allowed to rewrite Vidal’s screenplay.[21] Brass’s screenplay expanded the sexual content to include orgies, decorative phalluses, and much female nudity.[21] Guccione said Brass’s rewrites were done out of necessity to the film’s visual narrative and did not alter the dialogue or content.[18]
In an interview for Time magazine, Vidal said that in film production, directors were «parasites» and a film’s author was its screenwriter; in response, Brass demanded Vidal’s removal from the set and Guccione agreed.[18] Guccione considered the film to be a «collective effort, involving the input of a great number of artists and craftsmen», and the director to be the leader of a «team effort».[18] Vidal filed a contractual dispute over the film because of Brass’s rewrites;[18] Guccione said Vidal had demanded 10% of the film’s profits, which Vidal said was not the case.[20] Vidal distanced himself from the production, calling Brass a «megalomaniac». Brass publicly stated, «If I ever really get mad at Gore Vidal, I’ll publish his script».[22] Vidal’s name was removed from the film’s title; the credits were changed to state that the film was «adapted from a screenplay by Gore Vidal», crediting no official screenwriter.[23] Guccione said, «Gore’s work was basically done and Tinto’s work was about to begin».[18]
Themes and significance[edit]
What shall it profit a man if he should gain the whole world and lose his own soul?
Mark 8:36, quoted at the film’s beginning,[24] establishing the film’s theme that «absolute power corrupts absolutely»[25]
The film’s primary theme is «absolute power corrupts absolutely».[25] Vidal’s script presented Caligula as a good man driven to madness by absolute power;[21] Brass’s screenplay envisioned Caligula as a «born monster».[21] In The Encyclopedia of Epic Films, author Djoymi Baker describes Brass’s screenplay as «an antiepic with an antihero, on a path of self-inflicted, antisocial descent».[26] Guccione said this final draft was more violent than sexual, stating, «I maintain the film is actually anti-erotic … in every one of its scenes you’ll find a mixture of gore or violence or some other rather ugly things».[25]
Casting[edit]
Orson Welles was initially offered $1 million to star as Tiberius,[27] a figure which would have been his highest ever salary, but he refused on moral grounds when he read the script. Gore Vidal expressed disbelief that this could have ever been the case as he felt that Welles could not have portrayed Tiberius, but then recalled Kenneth Tynan remarking to him at the time that Welles was «upset» by the script.[28] Renowned actors who did accept roles in the film included Malcolm McDowell, Helen Mirren, Peter O’Toole and Sir John Gielgud, with Maria Schneider cast as Caligula’s doomed sister Drusilla.[22] Schneider became uncomfortable with appearing nude and in sexual scenes, and left the production, to be replaced by Teresa Ann Savoy, whom Brass had previously worked with on Salon Kitty.[22] Schneider had also apparently angered Brass by sewing up the open tunics she was supposed to wear on camera.[29] Gielgud was also offered the role of Tiberius, which he declined, as he felt Vidal’s script was «pornographic», but he later accepted the shorter role of Nerva.[30] Director Tinto Brass cast his own acquaintances as senators and noblemen, including ex-convicts, thieves and anarchists.[18][31] Guccione cast Penthouse Pets as female extras in sexual scenes.[18]
Filming[edit]
Principal photography began in 1976 in Rome.[18] McDowell got along well with Tinto Brass, while Peter O’Toole immediately disliked the director. John Gielgud and Helen Mirren were indifferent to Brass; they ultimately trusted his direction and focused on their own performances.[18] O’Toole had stopped drinking alcohol before filming, but Guccione described O’Toole as being «strung out on something» and said the actor was not sober during the entire filming schedule.[18]
Guccione later complained about McDowell’s behavior, calling the actor «shallow» and «stingy». According to Guccione, during the film’s production, McDowell took members of the production to dinner at an expensive restaurant to celebrate England’s win in a football match against the Italian team, and left the choreographer to pay for the meal, saying he had forgotten to bring enough money.[18] Also according to Guccione, at the end of the production, McDowell gave his dresser a pendant bearing her name, but it was misspelled and she gave it back to him. McDowell offered her a signet ring, a prop from the film. She refused because it belonged to the production company.[18]
Brass decided not to focus much on Danilo Donati’s elaborate sets, and intentionally kept the Penthouse Pets in the background during sex scenes, sometimes not filming them at all. Guccione later said that Brass, apparently as a joke, would focus on «fat, ugly and wrinkled old women» and have them play the «sensual parts» intended for the Penthouse Pets.[18] Brass and Guccione disagreed about the film’s approach to sexual content; Guccione preferred unsimulated sexual content that Brass did not want to film.[32]
Post-production[edit]
Tinto Brass served as the film’s director, but disowned the film in post-production, and was credited only for «principal photography».[33]
Filming concluded on 24 December 1976.[18] Guccione said Brass shot enough film to «make the original version of Ben-Hur about 50 times over».[18] Brass started editing the film but was not allowed to continue after he had edited approximately the first hour of it. His rough cut was disassembled, and the film was edited by several editors, changing its tone and structure significantly by removing and re-arranging many scenes, using different takes, a slower editing style, and music other than Brass intended.[34]
A few weeks after filming had concluded, Guccione and Giancarlo Lui returned to Rome along with several Penthouse Pets. Guccione and Lui «hired a skeleton crew, snuck back into the studios at night, raided the prop room»[18] and shot a number of hardcore sex scenes to be edited into the film.[31][32] The new unsimulated sex scenes included Penthouse pets Anneka Di Lorenzo and Lori Wagner, who appeared as supporting characters in Brass’ original footage. Both performed a lesbian scene together.[18] Brass ultimately disowned the film[33] as a result, and the credits only list «principal photography by Tinto Brass».[35]
Although there were a number of editors on the film, their names were not credited. Instead, the credit «Editing by the Production» is given during the opening credits.[citation needed]
As it was intended for an international release, the film was shot entirely in English. It was shot without sound, like the majority of Italian films, with the main English-speaking actors re-recording their lines later. However, as many of the supporting actors/actresses were Italian, their lines needed to be dubbed in English by other performers.[36]
Peter O’Toole was reluctant to re-record his English dialogue; he avoided the film’s producers, though they eventually tracked him down to Canada where they «dragged him in front of a mike» to record his dialogue. After production ended, O’Toole expressed his dislike of the film (although according to Guccione he hadn’t even seen the rushes) and doubted that it would ever be released.[18]
Caligula spent so much time in post-production that the film’s co-producer Franco Rossellini feared that it would never be released. Rossellini then decided to make Caligula‘s expensive sets and costumes profitable by using them in Messalina, Messalina!, a sex comedy directed by Bruno Corbucci. That film was released in Italy in 1977, two years before Caligula could be shown to the public. In some territories, it was released after Caligula and falsely marketed as its sequel. Anneka Di Lorenzo (as the title character) and Lori Wagner both reprised their roles from Caligula in Corbucci’s film. Danilo Donati’s sets and costumes were reused without his permission.[37]
Soundtrack[edit]
Caligula: The Music | |
---|---|
Soundtrack album by
Paul Clemente |
|
Released | 1980 |
Recorded |
|
Genre | Film score, neoclassical, pop, disco |
Length | 36:22 |
Label | Penthouse Records |
Producer | Toni Biggs |
The film was scored by Bruno Nicolai under the name Paul Clemente.[3][4] According to Kristopher Spencer, the score «is gloriously dramatic, capturing both the decadent atmosphere of ancient Rome and the twisted tragedy of its true story».[4] The score also featured music by Aram Khachaturian (from Spartacus) and Sergei Prokofiev (from Romeo and Juliet).[4] In November 1980, Guccione formed Penthouse Records to release a double album soundtrack to Caligula.[38] The album featured Nicolai’s score and two versions—one in a disco style—of a love theme titled «We Are One», which did not appear in the film.[4][39]
Track listing[edit]
No. | Title | Writer(s) | Vocals | Length |
---|---|---|---|---|
1. | «We Are One (Caligula Love Theme)» | Toni Biggs | Lydia Van Huston | 3:18 |
No. | Title | Writer(s) | Vocals | Length |
---|---|---|---|---|
1. | «We Are One (Caligula Love Theme Dance Version)» | Toni Biggs | Lydia Van Huston | 4:33 |
No. | Title | Writer(s) | Length |
---|---|---|---|
1. | «Wood Sequence (Intro/Spartacus/Romeo & Juliet)» | Paul Clemente, Aram Khatchaturian, Sergei Prokofiev | 4:20 |
2. | «Caligula & Ennia (Anfitrione)» | Paul Clemente | 1:52 |
3. | «Caligula’s Dance (Marziale)» | Paul Clemente | 1:20 |
4. | «Drusilla’s Bedroom (Spartacus)» | Aram Khatchaturian | 0:55 |
5. | «Isis Pool (Oblio)» | Paul Clemente | 4:15 |
6. | «Livia/Proculus Wedding (Movimento)» | Paul Clemente | 3:37 |
7. | «Caesonia’s Dance (Primitivo)» | Paul Clemente | 1:25 |
No. | Title | Writer(s) | Length |
---|---|---|---|
1. | «Drusilla’s Death — Main Theme (Spartacus)» | Aram Khatchaturian | 5:48 |
2. | «Orgy On Ship (Cinderella/Midnight Waltz)» | Sergei Prokofiev | 1:52 |
3. | «Orgy On Ship — Part II (Orgia)» | Paul Clemente | 2:28 |
4. | «Battle Of Britain (Spartan War)» | John Leach | 1:26 |
5. | «Play/Stadium (Equiziana)» | Paul Clemente | 2:47 |
6. | «Caligula’s Death (Romeo & Juliet)» | Sergei Prokofiev | 3:32 |
7. | «Reprise (Spartacus [Main Theme])» | Aram Khatchaturian | 0:45 |
Release[edit]
Helen Mirren was cast as Caesonia, wife of Caligula. Mirren described the film as an «irresistible mix of art and genitals».[40]
An edited version of the film had a limited run in a small town near Forlì, Italy before opening in Rome on Sunday, November 11, 1979.[41] In Rome, it was the highest-grossing film of the weekend, with a gross of $59,950 from 6 theaters.[42][41] The film was confiscated by Italian police on November 15 with the Pubblico Ministero calling many scenes in the film «flagrantly obscene».[41]
In the United States, Guccione refused to submit Caligula to the MPAA because he did not want the film to receive a rating—even X—which he considered to be «demeaning».[9] Instead, Guccione applied his own «Mature Audiences» rating to the film, instructing theater owners not to admit anyone under the age of 18.[43] The film premiered in the United States on 1 February 1980, at the Trans Lux East Theatre, which Guccione had rented exclusively to screen the film; he changed the theater’s name to Penthouse East.[8]
Rather than leasing prints to exhibitors, the distributor rented theaters that specialized in foreign and art films for the purpose of screening Caligula exclusively[44] in order to keep the film out of theaters that showed pornographic films.[43][44][45] In 1981, the Brazilian Board of Censors approved the establishment of special theaters to screen In the Realm of the Senses and Caligula because they were international box office hits.[46]
Caligula grossed US$23 million[10] at the box office.[10][47] The film was a financial success in France, Germany, Switzerland, Belgium, the Netherlands and Japan.[38] A 105-minute R-rated version without the explicit sexual material was released in 1981.[23][48][49]
The script was adapted into a novelization written by William Johnston under the pseudonym William Howard.[15]
Legal problems[edit]
In 1979, when Guccione tried to import the film’s footage into the U.S., customs officials seized it. Federal officials did not declare the film to be obscene.[45] When the film was released in New York City, the anti-pornography organization Morality in Media unsuccessfully filed a lawsuit against these federal officials.[45]
In Boston, authorities seized the film.[45] Penthouse took legal action, partly because Guccione thought the legal challenges and moral controversies would provide «the kind of [marketing] coverage money can never buy».[50] Penthouse won the case when a Boston Municipal Court ruled that Caligula had passed the Miller test and was not obscene.[50] While the Boston judge said the film «lacked artistic and scientific value» because of its depiction of sex and considered it to «[appeal] to prurient interests», he said the film’s depiction of ancient Rome contained political values which enabled it to pass the Miller test in its depiction of corruption in ancient Rome, which dramatized the political theme that «absolute power corrupts absolutely».[25] A Madison, Wisconsin, district attorney declined an anti-pornography crusader’s request to prevent the release of Caligula on the basis that «the most offensive portions of the film are those explicitly depicting violent, and not sexual conduct, which is not in any way prohibited by the criminal law».[25]
Atlanta prosecutors threatened legal action if the film was to be screened in the city, but experts testified in court on behalf of the film, and Atlanta, too, declared that the film was not obscene.[45] Citizens for Decency through Law, a private watchdog group that protested against films that it deemed immoral, sought to prevent the film’s exhibition in Fairlawn, Ohio, on the grounds that it would be a «public nuisance», leading Penthouse to withdraw the film from exhibition there to avoid another trial.[25] CDL’s lawyer advised against attempting to prosecute Penthouse for obscenity and instead recommended a civil proceeding, because the film would not be placed against the Miller test.[25] The Penthouse attorney described the Fairlawn events as being driven by conservative morality reinforced by Ronald Reagan’s presidential victory, stating: «Apparently, these extremists have interpreted a change by the administration to mean a clarion call for a mandate to shackle the public’s mind again.»[25] The uncut film was granted a certificate by the British Board of Film Classification in 2008. The film was banned in Australia, where it continues to be banned in its uncut form as of 2014.[51]
In 1981, Anneka Di Lorenzo, who played Messalina, sued Guccione, claiming sexual harassment. In 1990, after protracted litigation, a New York state court awarded her $60,000 in compensatory damages and $4 million in punitive damages. On appeal, the court vacated the award, ruling that punitive damages were not allowed by the law governing the case.[52]
Contemporary reviews[edit]
Caligula received generally negative reviews. The films holds a 22% rating on Rotten Tomatoes based on thirty-two reviews. The site’s consensus states: «Endlessly perverse and indulgent, Caligula throws in hardcore sex every time the plot threatens to get interesting.»[53] Roger Ebert gave it zero stars, calling it «sickening, utterly worthless, shameful trash». Ebert wrote: «In the two hours of this film that I saw, there were no scenes of joy, natural pleasure, or good sensual cheer. There was, instead, a nauseating excursion into base and sad fantasies.»[54] It was one of the few films Ebert ever walked out of—he walked out 2 hours into its 170-minute length after feeling «disgusted and unspeakably depressed».[54] He and Gene Siskel selected the film as one of their «dogs of the year» in a 1980 episode of Sneak Previews.[55] Hank Werba of Variety described the film as a «moral holocaust» in his review.[56][57] Rex Reed called Caligula «a trough of rotten swill».[31] Jay Scott, reviewing Caligula for The Globe and Mail, said, «Caligula doesn’t really work on any level».[58] Scott unfavourably compared Caligula with In the Realm of the Senses, describing the latter film as a better treatment of extreme sexuality.[58] Scott’s review went on to say «Rome would seem to be at least as fecund a territory for the cinematic exploration of sex, death and money, as pre-war Japan … but what’s missing from Caligula, which is rife with all three, is any connective tissue (also any point of view, any thought, any meaning)».[58] Scott concluded his review by claiming the whole film’s production was «a boondoggle of landmark proportions».[58] New York critic David Denby described the film as «an infinitely degraded version of Fellini Satyricon«.[33] Tom Milne (Monthly Film Bulletin) stated that the film was «by no means so awesomely bad as most critics have been pleased to report—but pretty bad all the same» and found the film to be «notable chiefly for the accuracy with which it reflects [Caligula’s] anonymity».[59]
Legacy[edit]
Caligula continued to garner negative reception long after its release, though it has been reappraised by some critics, and attempts have been made to reconstruct a version of the film that more closely resembles the visions of either Tinto Brass or Gore Vidal. Review aggregate Rotten Tomatoes gives the film a score of 22% based on 32 reviews, with an average rating of 3.9/10. The site’s critical consensus reads: «Endlessly perverse and indulgent, Caligula throws in hardcore sex every time the plot threatens to get interesting.»[53] Leslie Halliwell said Caligula was «a vile curiosity of interest chiefly to sado-masochists».[60] Time Out London called it «a dreary shambles».[61] Positive criticism of the film came from Moviehole reviewer Clint Morris, who awarded it 3 stars out of 5, calling it «[a] classic in the coolest sense of the word».[53] New Times critic Gregory Weinkauf gave the film 3 out of 5, calling it «Kinda dumb and tacky, but at least it’s a real movie».[53] Arkansas Democrat-Gazette reviewer Philip Martin also gave the film 3 out of 5.[53]
Writers for The Hamilton Spectator and St. Louis Post-Dispatch said Caligula was one of the worst films they’d seen.[62][63] Writing for The A.V. Club, Keith Phipps said, «As a one-of-a-kind marriage of the historical epic and the porn film … Caligula deserves a look. But it might be better to let Guccione’s savagely unpleasant folly fade into the century that spawned it».[64]
Several films were released in the following years as attempts to cash in on Caligula‘s reputation, including Caligula and Messalina (1981), directed by Bruno Mattei and Caligula… The Untold Story (1982), directed by Joe D’Amato. Like Caligula, D’Amato’s film exists in several softcore and hardcore versions.[65]
In 1985, the hardcore version of Caligula was broadcast in France on Canal+, making it the first film with unsimulated sex scenes ever shown on French television. The film, which had been broadcast as a test, became the starting point of Canal+’s tradition of showing one pornographic film at midnight every month.[66][67]
Retrospective recognition[edit]
Caligula has been described as a «cult classic» by William Hawes in a book about the film.[13] Helen Mirren has defended her involvement in the making of Caligula and even described the final product of the film as «an irresistible mix of art and genitals».[40] In 2005, artist Francesco Vezzoli produced a fake trailer for an alleged remake called Gore Vidal’s Caligula as a promotion for Versace’s new line of accessories; the remake was to star Helen Mirren as «the Empress Tiberius», Gerard Butler as Chaerea, Milla Jovovich as Drusilla, Courtney Love as Caligula, and Karen Black as Agrippina the Elder and featuring an introduction by Gore Vidal. The fake trailer was screened worldwide, including New York City’s Whitney Museum of American Art’s 2006 Whitney Biennial.[68]
Leonardo DiCaprio has cited Caligula as an influence on his performance as Jordan Belfort in The Wolf of Wall Street.[69]
Reconstruction attempts[edit]
In 2007, Caligula was released on DVD and Blu-ray in an «Imperial Edition»,[70] which featured the unrated theatrical release version and a new version featuring alternative sequencing from the original theatrical release and without the explicit sexual content shot by Guccione, marking the first attempt to reconstruct the film into a version closer to Brass’s intentions. This edition also includes audio commentaries featuring Malcolm McDowell and Helen Mirren, and interviews with the cast and crew.[71]
In February 2018, Penthouse announced that a new cut of the film was being edited by Alexander Tuschinski.[72] Tuschinski will use 85 minutes of Brass’s original workprint and edit the remainder of the film himself.[73] Brass’s family supports Tuschinski’s effort, but it remains unconfirmed if Brass will be directly involved with the edit.[74] However, the edit is an attempt to realize Brass’s original vision for the film.[16]
In July 2018, Alexander Tuschinski released his documentary Mission: Caligula on Vimeo. The film explores his relationship with Caligula, the process of reconstructing Brass’s vision, and Penthouse CEO Kelly Holland’s backing of the project.[16]
In 2020, another version of the film was announced to be released in the fall of that year, edited by E. Elias Merhige to follow more closely Gore Vidal’s original screenplay instead of Tinto Brass’s or Bob Guccione’s vision.[75]
See also[edit]
- List of films considered the worst
- Unsimulated sex
References[edit]
- ^ William Hawes (2008). Caligula and the Fight for Artistic Freedom: The Making, Marketing and Impact of the Bob Guccione Film. McFarland. ISBN 978-0-7864-5240-8.
- ^ The film’s titles credit both Baragli and «The Production», a credit possibly referring to Bob Guccione and his production assistants, with editing.
- ^ a b c William Hawes (2008). Caligula and the Fight for Artistic Freedom: The Making, Marketing and Impact of the Bob Guccione Film. McFarland. p. 233. ISBN 978-0-7864-5240-8.
- ^ a b c d e Kristopher Spencer (2008). Film and Television Scores, 1950–1979: A Critical Survey by Genre. McFarland. p. 125. ISBN 978-0-7864-5228-6.
- ^ Annuario del cinema italiano & audiovisivi (in Italian), Centro di studi di cultura, promozione e difusione del cinema, p. 59, OCLC 34869836
- ^ Anthony Slide (2014). The New Historical Dictionary of the American Film Industry. Routledge. p. 11. ISBN 978-1-135-92554-3.
- ^ William Hawes (2008). Caligula and the Fight for Artistic Freedom: The Making, Marketing and Impact of the Bob Guccione Film. McFarland. p. 195. ISBN 978-0-7864-5240-8.
- ^ a b William Hawes (2008). Caligula and the Fight for Artistic Freedom: The Making, Marketing and Impact of the Bob Guccione Film. McFarland. p. 196. ISBN 978-0-7864-5240-8.
- ^ a b John Heidenry (2002). What Wild Ecstasy. Simon and Schuster. p. 268. ISBN 978-0-7432-4184-7.
- ^ a b c «Caligula box office at the-numbers.com». the-numbers.com.
- ^ What Culture#14 Archived August 6, 2020, at the Wayback Machine: Caligula
- ^ «Film Censorship: Caligula (1979)». Refused-Classification.com. Retrieved June 9, 2012.
- ^ a b Hawes, William (2008). Caligula and the Fight for Artistic Freedom: The Making, Marketing and Impact of the Bob Guccione Film. McFarland. p. 1. ISBN 978-0-7864-5240-8.
- ^ Stephen Prince (1980–1989). A New Pot of Gold: Hollywood Under the Electronic Rainbow. p. 350.
- ^ a b Spencer, David (January–February 2010). «IAMTW’s Grand Master Scribe Award, The Faust, Goes to the Genre’s Most Prolific Practitioner» (PDF). Tied-In: The Newsletter of the International Association of Media Tie-in Writers. Calabasas, California: International Association of Media Tie-in Writers. 4 (1). Archived from the original (PDF) on March 4, 2016. Retrieved August 26, 2015.
- ^ a b c Tuschinski, Alexander (July 26, 2018), Mission: Caligula, retrieved July 27, 2018
- ^ «Caligula MMXX — announcement on website for 2020 re-release». Retrieved January 5, 2020.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y Ernest Volkman (May 1980). «Bob Guccione Caligula Interview from Penthouse May 1980». Penthouse: 112–118, 146–115. Archived from the original on August 8, 2014. Retrieved June 9, 2012.
- ^ Constantine Santas; James M. Wilson; Maria Colavito; Djoymi Baker (2014). The Encyclopedia of Epic Films. Scarecrow Press. p. 115. ISBN 978-0-8108-8248-5.
- ^ a b c «New York Magazine». Newyorkmetro.com. New York Media, LLC: 85. March 26, 1979. ISSN 0028-7369.
- ^ a b c d e f g h John Heidenry (2002). What Wild Ecstasy. Simon and Schuster. p. 266. ISBN 978-0-7432-4184-7.
- ^ a b c «Will the Real Caligula Stand Up?». Time (magazine). January 3, 1977. Archived from the original on January 19, 2008. Retrieved June 9, 2012.
- ^ a b Michael Weldon (1996). The Psychotronic Video Guide To Film. St. Martin’s Press. p. 87. ISBN 978-0-312-13149-4.
- ^ Stanley E. Porter (2007). Dictionary of Biblical Criticism and Interpretation. Routledge. p. 331. ISBN 978-1-134-63556-6.
- ^ a b c d e f g h Stephen Prince (2002). A New Pot of Gold: Hollywood Under the Electronic Rainbow, 1980–1989. University of California Press. pp. 350. ISBN 978-0-520-23266-2.
- ^ a b Constantine Santas; James M. Wilson; Maria Colavito; Djoymi Baker (2014). The Encyclopedia of Epic Films. Scarecrow Press. p. 118. ISBN 978-0-8108-8248-5.
- ^ Brady, Frank (1990) Citizen Welles, London: Hodder & Stoughton. ISBN 9780340513897. p. 563
- ^ Vidal, Gore (1989) «Remembering Orson Welles», New York Review of Books, June 1, 1989
- ^ «Stracult Movie — Therese Ann Savoy» Archived November 1, 2022, at the Wayback Machine, Video Rai TV (July 31, 2012)
- ^ a b William Hawes (2008). Caligula and the Fight for Artistic Freedom: The Making, Marketing and Impact of the Bob Guccione Film. McFarland. p. 105. ISBN 978-0-7864-5240-8.
- ^ a b c Thomas Vinciguerra (September 6, 1999). «Porn Again». nymag.com. Retrieved June 9, 2012.
- ^ a b Jeffrey Richards (2008). Hollywood’s Ancient Worlds. A&C Black. p. 157. ISBN 978-1-84725-007-0.
- ^ a b c «New York Magazine». Newyorkmetro.com. New York Media, LLC: 61. February 25, 1980. ISSN 0028-7369.
- ^ «Analysis and reconstruction of Tinto Brass’ intended version of Caligula (PDF, 15,2 MB, 106 pages)» (PDF). Retrieved September 9, 2014.
- ^ Deborah Cartmell, Ashley D. Polasek, A Companion to the Biopic, John Wiley & Sons Inc, 2019, p. 180
- ^ William Hawes (2008). Caligula and the Fight for Artistic Freedom: The Making, Marketing and Impact of the Bob Guccione Film. McFarland. p. 108. ISBN 978-0-7864-5240-8.
- ^ Howard Hughes (April 30, 2011). Cinema Italiano: The Complete Guide from Classics to Cult. I.B.Tauris, 2011, p. 288. ISBN 9780857730442.
- ^ a b Billboard. Nielsen Business Media, Inc. November 15, 1980. p. 8. ISSN 0006-2510.
- ^ Jerry Osborne (2002). Movie/TV Soundtracks and Original Cast Recordings Price and Reference Guide. Jerry Osborne Enterprises. p. 92. ISBN 978-0-932117-37-3.
- ^ a b William Hawes (2008). Caligula and the Fight for Artistic Freedom: The Making, Marketing and Impact of the Bob Guccione Film. McFarland. p. 191. ISBN 978-0-7864-5240-8.
- ^ a b c «Guccioni, Rossellini ‘Caligula’ Seized As ‘Flagrantly Obscene’«. Variety. November 21, 1979. p. 3.
- ^ «‘Caligula’ Big In Rome Debut, At $59,950; ‘Manhattan’ 44G, 2d». Variety. November 21, 1979. p. 43.
- ^ a b Stephen Vaughn (2006). Freedom and Entertainment: Rating the Movies in an Age of New Media. Cambridge University Press. p. 73. ISBN 978-0-521-85258-6.
- ^ a b Stephen Prince. A New Pot of Gold: Hollywood Under the Electronic Rainbow, 1980–1989. p. 349.
- ^ a b c d e Stephen Vaughn (2006). Freedom and Entertainment: Rating the Movies in an Age of New Media. Cambridge University Press. p. 74. ISBN 978-0-521-85258-6.
- ^ Lisa Shaw; Stephanie Dennison (2014). Brazilian National Cinema. Routledge. p. 100. ISBN 978-1-134-70210-7.
- ^ Joyce L. Vedral (1990). Uncle John’s Third Bathroom Reader. St. Martin’s Press. p. 155. ISBN 978-0-312-04586-9.
- ^ William Hawes (2008). Caligula and the Fight for Artistic Freedom: The Making, Marketing and Impact of the Bob Guccione Film. McFarland. p. 205. ISBN 978-0-7864-5240-8.
- ^ David Welling (2010). Cinema Houston: From Nickelodeon to Megaplex. University of Texas Press. p. 249. ISBN 978-0-292-77398-1.
- ^ a b Stephen Prince (2002). A New Pot of Gold: Hollywood Under the Electronic Rainbow, 1980–1989. University of California Press. pp. 349. ISBN 978-0-520-23266-2.
- ^ Robert Cetti (2014). Offensive to a Reasonable Adult: Film Censorship and Classification in Australia. Robert Cettl. p. 48. ISBN 978-0-9872425-5-6.
- ^ «Marjorie Lee Thoreson A/K/A Anneka Dilorenzo, Appellant-Respondent, V. Penthouse International, Ltd. And Robert C. Guccione, Respondents-Appellants». law.cornell.edu. Retrieved January 19, 2011.
- ^ a b c d e «Caligula (1979)». Rotten Tomatoes. Retrieved July 3, 2014.
- ^ a b Roger Ebert (September 22, 1980). «Caligula». Chicago Sun-Times. Retrieved June 9, 2012.
- ^ «Siskel & Ebert org — Worst of 1980». Archived from the original on January 8, 2018. Retrieved February 1, 2015.
- ^ Werba, Hank (November 21, 1979). «Film Reviews: Caligula». Variety. p. 24.
- ^ «100 Most Controversial Films of All Time».
- ^ a b c d Jay Scott, The Globe and Mail, February 7, 1980.
- ^ Milne, Tom (1980). «Caligula». Monthly Film Bulletin. Vol. 47, no. 552. British Film Institute. p. 232. ISSN 0027-0407.
- ^ Photoplay Magazine, Volume 38, 1987 (p.38)
- ^ «Caligula (1979)». Time Out. Retrieved June 9, 2012.
- ^ «Lowest:100 Really Bad Moments in 20th Century Entertainment». The Hamilton Spectator, July 24, 1999 (p. W17).
- ^ Joe Holleman, «Roman Warriors roam the big screen again». St. Louis Post-Dispatch May 5, 2000 (p. E1).
- ^ Keith Phipps
(April 23, 2002) Caligula Archived November 1, 2022, at the Wayback Machine. The AV Club. Retrieved January 12, 2014. - ^ Grattarola, Franco; Napoli, Andrea (2014). Luce Rossa. La nascita e le prime fasi del cinema pornografico in Italia. Roma: Iacobelli Editore, pp. 278-280
- ^ Du carré blanc au film porno de Canal+, une brève histoire du sexe à la télévision Archived June 1, 2022, at the Wayback Machine, Le Parisien, 30 October 2021
- ^ la recherche du porno perdu Archived June 3, 2022, at the Wayback Machine, Libération, 14 October 2019
- ^ Linda Yablonsky (February 26, 2006). «‘Caligula’ Gives a Toga Party (but No One’s Really Invited)». The New York Times. Retrieved June 9, 2012.
- ^ «Leonardo DiCaprio channelled Caligula for Wolf of Wall Street». WENN.com. December 18, 2013. Archived from the original on December 8, 2015.
- ^ Monica S. Cyrino (2013). Screening Love and Sex in the Ancient World. Palgrave Macmillan. p. 148. ISBN 978-1-137-29960-4.
- ^ Martin M. Winkler (2009). Cinema and Classical Texts: Apollo’s New Light. Cambridge University Press. p. 32. ISBN 978-0-521-51860-4.
- ^ AVN, Mark Kernes. «Penthouse Event Previews New Version of Classic Film ‘Caligula’ | AVN». AVN. Retrieved March 12, 2018.
- ^ «Film-Analyses / Caligula». alexander-tuschinski.de. Retrieved March 12, 2018.
- ^ Archived at Ghostarchive and the Wayback Machine: MISSION CALIGULA Q&A at Hollywood Reel Independent Film Festival — February 26, 2018, February 28, 2018, retrieved March 12, 2018
- ^ «Caligula MMXX — announcement on website for 2020 re-release». Retrieved January 5, 2020.
External links[edit]
Caligula | |
---|---|
Theatrical release poster |
|
Directed by |
|
Screenplay by |
|
Story by | Gore Vidal (original screenplay) |
Based on | Life of Caligula |
Produced by |
|
Starring |
|
Cinematography | Silvano Ippoliti |
Edited by |
|
Music by |
|
Production |
|
Distributed by |
|
Release dates |
|
Running time |
156 minutes |
Countries |
|
Languages |
|
Budget | $17.5 million[9] |
Box office | $23.4 million[10] |
Caligula (Italian: Caligola) is a 1979 erotic historical drama film focusing on the rise and fall of the Roman Emperor Caligula. The film stars Malcolm McDowell in the title role, alongside Teresa Ann Savoy, Helen Mirren, Peter O’Toole, John Steiner and John Gielgud. Producer Bob Guccione, the founder of Penthouse magazine, intended to produce an erotic feature film narrative with high production values and name actors.
Gore Vidal originated the idea for a film about the controversial Roman emperor and produced a draft screenplay under the working title Gore Vidal’s Caligula. The director, Tinto Brass, extensively altered Vidal’s original screenplay, however, leading Vidal to disavow the film. The final screenplay focuses on the idea that «absolute power corrupts absolutely». The producers did not allow Brass to edit the film, and changed its tone and style significantly, adding graphic unsimulated sex scenes featuring Penthouse Pets as extras filmed in post-production by Guccione and Giancarlo Lui. Brass had refused to film those sequences, as both he and Vidal disagreed with their inclusion. The version of the film released in Italian cinemas in 1979 and in American cinemas the following year, disregarded Brass’s intentions to present the film as a political satire, prompting him to disavow the film as well.[11]
Caligula‘s release was met with legal issues and controversies over its violent and sexual content; multiple cut versions were released worldwide, while its uncut form remains banned in several countries.[12] Despite the generally negative reception, with some critics also citing it among the worst movies ever made, the film is considered to be a cult classic[13] with significant merit for its political content and historical portrayal.[14]
The script was later adapted into a novelisation written by William Johnston under the pseudonym William Howard.[15] In 2018, Penthouse announced that a new Director’s Cut of the film was being edited by Alexander Tuschinski, with the approval of Brass’s family.[16] No release date for that cut has been confirmed. In 2020, another version of the film was announced to be released in the fall of that year, edited by author and historian Thomas Negovan to follow more closely Gore Vidal’s original screenplay instead of Tinto Brass’s or Bob Guccione’s vision.[17]
Plot[edit]
Caligula is the young heir to the throne of his great uncle, the Emperor Tiberius. One morning, a blackbird flies into his room; Caligula considers this a bad omen. Shortly afterward, one of the heads of the Praetorian Guard, Naevius Sutorius Macro, tells Caligula that Tiberius demands his immediate presence at Capri, where the Emperor lives with his close friend Nerva, dim-witted relative Claudius, and Caligula’s adopted son (Tiberius’s grandson) Gemellus. Fearing assassination, Caligula is afraid to leave but his sister and lover Drusilla persuades him to go.
At Capri, Caligula finds that Tiberius has become depraved, showing signs of advanced venereal diseases, and embittered with Rome and politics. Tiberius enjoys swimming with naked youths and watching degrading sex shows that include deformed people and animals. Caligula observes with fascination and horror. Tensions rise when Tiberius tries to poison Caligula in front of Gemellus. Nerva commits suicide and Caligula tries to kill Tiberius but loses his nerve. Proving his loyalty to Caligula, Macro kills Tiberius instead with Gemellus as a witness.
After Tiberius’ death and burial, Caligula is proclaimed the new Emperor, then proclaims Drusilla as his equal, to the apparent disgust of the Roman Senate. Drusilla, fearful of Macro’s influence, persuades Caligula to get rid of him. Caligula sets up a mock trial in which Gemellus is intimidated into testifying that Macro murdered Tiberius, then has Macro’s wife Ennia banished from Rome. After Macro is executed in a gruesome public game, Caligula appoints Tiberius’ former adviser Longinus as his personal assistant while pronouncing the docile Senator Chaerea as the new head of the Praetorian Guard.
Drusilla tries to find Caligula a wife among the priestesses of the goddess Isis, the cult they secretly practice. Caligula wants to marry Drusilla, but she insists they cannot marry because she is his sister. Instead, Caligula marries Caesonia, a priestess and notorious courtesan, after she bears him an heir. Drusilla reluctantly supports their marriage. Meanwhile, despite Caligula’s popularity with the masses, the Senate expresses disapproval for what initially seem to be light eccentricities. Darker aspects of Caligula’s personality emerge when he rapes a bride and groom on their wedding day in a minor fit of jealousy and orders Gemellus’s execution to provoke a reaction from Drusilla.
After discovering that Caesonia is pregnant, Caligula develops a severe fever. Drusilla nurses him back to health. Just as he fully recovers, Caesonia bears him a daughter, Julia Drusilla. During the celebration, Drusilla collapses with the same fever he had had. Soon afterward, Caligula receives another ill omen in the form of a blackbird. Despite his praying to Isis out of desperation, Drusilla dies from her fever. Initially unable to accept her death, Caligula has a nervous breakdown and rampages through the palace, destroying a statue of Isis while clutching Drusilla’s body.
Now in a deep depression, Caligula walks the Roman streets disguised as a beggar; he causes a disturbance after watching an amateur performance mocking his relationship with Drusilla. After a brief stay in a city gaol, Caligula proclaims himself a god and becomes determined to destroy the senatorial class, which he has come to loathe. The new reign he leads becomes a series of humiliations against the foundations of Rome—senators’ wives are forced to work in the service of the state as prostitutes, estates are confiscated, the old religion is desecrated, and the army is made to embark on a mock invasion of Britain. Unable to further tolerate his actions, Longinus conspires with Chaerea to assassinate Caligula.
Caligula enters his bedroom where a nervous Caesonia awaits him. Another blackbird appears but only Caesonia is frightened of it. The next morning, after rehearsing an Egyptian play, Caligula and his family are attacked in a coup headed by Chaerea. Caesonia and Julia are murdered, and Chaerea stabs Caligula in the stomach. With his final breath, the Emperor defiantly whimpers «I live!» as Caligula and his family’s bodies are thrown down the stadium’s steps and their blood is washed off the marble floor. Claudius witnesses the entire ordeal and is horrified even after being proclaimed Emperor by the Praetorian Guard.
Cast[edit]
- Malcolm McDowell as Caligula
- Teresa Ann Savoy as Drusilla
- Guido Mannari as Macro
- Patrick Allen as Macro (English dub voice) (uncredited)[3]
- John Gielgud as Nerva
- Peter O’Toole as Tiberius
- Giancarlo Badessi as Claudius
- Bruno Brive as Gemellus
- Adriana Asti as Ennia
- Leopoldo Trieste as Charicles
- Paolo Bonacelli as Cassius Chaerea
- Joss Ackland as Cassius Chaerea (English dub voice) (uncredited)
- John Steiner as Longinus
- Mirella D’Angelo as Livilla
- Helen Mirren as Caesonia
- Richard Parets as Mnester
- Paula Mitchell as Subura Singer
- Osiride Pevarello as Giant
- Donato Placido as Proculus
- Anneka Di Lorenzo as Messalina
- Lori Wagner as Agrippina
- Valerie Rae Clark as Imperial Brothel Worker
- Susanne Saxon as Imperial Brothel Worker
- Jane Hargrave as Imperial Brothel Worker
- Carolyn Patsis as Imperial Brothel Worker
- Bonnie Dee Wilson as Imperial Brothel Worker
Production[edit]
Development[edit]
Gore Vidal was paid $200,000 to write the screenplay for Caligula;[18] ultimately, the film credited no official screenwriter, only that it was «adapted from a screenplay» by Vidal.
The men’s magazine Penthouse had long been involved in film funding, helping invest in films made by other studios, including Chinatown, The Longest Yard and The Day of the Locust, but it had never produced a film on its own.[18] The magazine’s founder Bob Guccione wanted to produce an explicit adult film within a feature film narrative that had high production values; he decided to produce a film about the rise and fall of the Roman emperor Caligula.[19] Development began under producer Franco Rossellini, the nephew of filmmaker Roberto Rossellini.[18] A screenplay was written by Lina Wertmüller, but Guccione rejected Wertmüller’s script and paid Gore Vidal to write a new screenplay.[20] Vidal’s script had a strong focus on homosexuality, leading Guccione to demand rewrites which toned down the homosexual content for wider audience appeal. Guccione was concerned that Vidal’s script contained several homosexual sex scenes and only one scene of heterosexual sex, which was between Caligula and his sister Drusilla.[20][21] Vidal was paid US$200,000 for his screenplay, which was titled Gore Vidal’s Caligula.[18]
Elaborate sets were built by production designer Danilo Donati, who also designed the film’s costumes, jewelry, hairstyles, wigs, and makeup.[18] Several mainstream actors were cast, Guccione intending to make a film that he felt, like Citizen Kane, would be a landmark in cinematic history.[21] Guccione offered directing duties to John Huston and Lina Wertmüller, both of whom rejected the film.[18] After viewing scenes from the film Salon Kitty, Guccione agreed to have lunch with that film’s director Tinto Brass, believing Brass would be the ideal person to direct Caligula.[21] Brass had a reputation for being difficult to deal with on film sets but Guccione thought the film’s epic scope would «keep [Brass] in line» and that Brass understood the concept of the film enough to direct it.[18] Brass described Vidal’s screenplay as «the work of an aging arteriosclerotic» and agreed to direct only if he was allowed to rewrite Vidal’s screenplay.[21] Brass’s screenplay expanded the sexual content to include orgies, decorative phalluses, and much female nudity.[21] Guccione said Brass’s rewrites were done out of necessity to the film’s visual narrative and did not alter the dialogue or content.[18]
In an interview for Time magazine, Vidal said that in film production, directors were «parasites» and a film’s author was its screenwriter; in response, Brass demanded Vidal’s removal from the set and Guccione agreed.[18] Guccione considered the film to be a «collective effort, involving the input of a great number of artists and craftsmen», and the director to be the leader of a «team effort».[18] Vidal filed a contractual dispute over the film because of Brass’s rewrites;[18] Guccione said Vidal had demanded 10% of the film’s profits, which Vidal said was not the case.[20] Vidal distanced himself from the production, calling Brass a «megalomaniac». Brass publicly stated, «If I ever really get mad at Gore Vidal, I’ll publish his script».[22] Vidal’s name was removed from the film’s title; the credits were changed to state that the film was «adapted from a screenplay by Gore Vidal», crediting no official screenwriter.[23] Guccione said, «Gore’s work was basically done and Tinto’s work was about to begin».[18]
Themes and significance[edit]
What shall it profit a man if he should gain the whole world and lose his own soul?
Mark 8:36, quoted at the film’s beginning,[24] establishing the film’s theme that «absolute power corrupts absolutely»[25]
The film’s primary theme is «absolute power corrupts absolutely».[25] Vidal’s script presented Caligula as a good man driven to madness by absolute power;[21] Brass’s screenplay envisioned Caligula as a «born monster».[21] In The Encyclopedia of Epic Films, author Djoymi Baker describes Brass’s screenplay as «an antiepic with an antihero, on a path of self-inflicted, antisocial descent».[26] Guccione said this final draft was more violent than sexual, stating, «I maintain the film is actually anti-erotic … in every one of its scenes you’ll find a mixture of gore or violence or some other rather ugly things».[25]
Casting[edit]
Orson Welles was initially offered $1 million to star as Tiberius,[27] a figure which would have been his highest ever salary, but he refused on moral grounds when he read the script. Gore Vidal expressed disbelief that this could have ever been the case as he felt that Welles could not have portrayed Tiberius, but then recalled Kenneth Tynan remarking to him at the time that Welles was «upset» by the script.[28] Renowned actors who did accept roles in the film included Malcolm McDowell, Helen Mirren, Peter O’Toole and Sir John Gielgud, with Maria Schneider cast as Caligula’s doomed sister Drusilla.[22] Schneider became uncomfortable with appearing nude and in sexual scenes, and left the production, to be replaced by Teresa Ann Savoy, whom Brass had previously worked with on Salon Kitty.[22] Schneider had also apparently angered Brass by sewing up the open tunics she was supposed to wear on camera.[29] Gielgud was also offered the role of Tiberius, which he declined, as he felt Vidal’s script was «pornographic», but he later accepted the shorter role of Nerva.[30] Director Tinto Brass cast his own acquaintances as senators and noblemen, including ex-convicts, thieves and anarchists.[18][31] Guccione cast Penthouse Pets as female extras in sexual scenes.[18]
Filming[edit]
Principal photography began in 1976 in Rome.[18] McDowell got along well with Tinto Brass, while Peter O’Toole immediately disliked the director. John Gielgud and Helen Mirren were indifferent to Brass; they ultimately trusted his direction and focused on their own performances.[18] O’Toole had stopped drinking alcohol before filming, but Guccione described O’Toole as being «strung out on something» and said the actor was not sober during the entire filming schedule.[18]
Guccione later complained about McDowell’s behavior, calling the actor «shallow» and «stingy». According to Guccione, during the film’s production, McDowell took members of the production to dinner at an expensive restaurant to celebrate England’s win in a football match against the Italian team, and left the choreographer to pay for the meal, saying he had forgotten to bring enough money.[18] Also according to Guccione, at the end of the production, McDowell gave his dresser a pendant bearing her name, but it was misspelled and she gave it back to him. McDowell offered her a signet ring, a prop from the film. She refused because it belonged to the production company.[18]
Brass decided not to focus much on Danilo Donati’s elaborate sets, and intentionally kept the Penthouse Pets in the background during sex scenes, sometimes not filming them at all. Guccione later said that Brass, apparently as a joke, would focus on «fat, ugly and wrinkled old women» and have them play the «sensual parts» intended for the Penthouse Pets.[18] Brass and Guccione disagreed about the film’s approach to sexual content; Guccione preferred unsimulated sexual content that Brass did not want to film.[32]
Post-production[edit]
Tinto Brass served as the film’s director, but disowned the film in post-production, and was credited only for «principal photography».[33]
Filming concluded on 24 December 1976.[18] Guccione said Brass shot enough film to «make the original version of Ben-Hur about 50 times over».[18] Brass started editing the film but was not allowed to continue after he had edited approximately the first hour of it. His rough cut was disassembled, and the film was edited by several editors, changing its tone and structure significantly by removing and re-arranging many scenes, using different takes, a slower editing style, and music other than Brass intended.[34]
A few weeks after filming had concluded, Guccione and Giancarlo Lui returned to Rome along with several Penthouse Pets. Guccione and Lui «hired a skeleton crew, snuck back into the studios at night, raided the prop room»[18] and shot a number of hardcore sex scenes to be edited into the film.[31][32] The new unsimulated sex scenes included Penthouse pets Anneka Di Lorenzo and Lori Wagner, who appeared as supporting characters in Brass’ original footage. Both performed a lesbian scene together.[18] Brass ultimately disowned the film[33] as a result, and the credits only list «principal photography by Tinto Brass».[35]
Although there were a number of editors on the film, their names were not credited. Instead, the credit «Editing by the Production» is given during the opening credits.[citation needed]
As it was intended for an international release, the film was shot entirely in English. It was shot without sound, like the majority of Italian films, with the main English-speaking actors re-recording their lines later. However, as many of the supporting actors/actresses were Italian, their lines needed to be dubbed in English by other performers.[36]
Peter O’Toole was reluctant to re-record his English dialogue; he avoided the film’s producers, though they eventually tracked him down to Canada where they «dragged him in front of a mike» to record his dialogue. After production ended, O’Toole expressed his dislike of the film (although according to Guccione he hadn’t even seen the rushes) and doubted that it would ever be released.[18]
Caligula spent so much time in post-production that the film’s co-producer Franco Rossellini feared that it would never be released. Rossellini then decided to make Caligula‘s expensive sets and costumes profitable by using them in Messalina, Messalina!, a sex comedy directed by Bruno Corbucci. That film was released in Italy in 1977, two years before Caligula could be shown to the public. In some territories, it was released after Caligula and falsely marketed as its sequel. Anneka Di Lorenzo (as the title character) and Lori Wagner both reprised their roles from Caligula in Corbucci’s film. Danilo Donati’s sets and costumes were reused without his permission.[37]
Soundtrack[edit]
Caligula: The Music | |
---|---|
Soundtrack album by
Paul Clemente |
|
Released | 1980 |
Recorded |
|
Genre | Film score, neoclassical, pop, disco |
Length | 36:22 |
Label | Penthouse Records |
Producer | Toni Biggs |
The film was scored by Bruno Nicolai under the name Paul Clemente.[3][4] According to Kristopher Spencer, the score «is gloriously dramatic, capturing both the decadent atmosphere of ancient Rome and the twisted tragedy of its true story».[4] The score also featured music by Aram Khachaturian (from Spartacus) and Sergei Prokofiev (from Romeo and Juliet).[4] In November 1980, Guccione formed Penthouse Records to release a double album soundtrack to Caligula.[38] The album featured Nicolai’s score and two versions—one in a disco style—of a love theme titled «We Are One», which did not appear in the film.[4][39]
Track listing[edit]
No. | Title | Writer(s) | Vocals | Length |
---|---|---|---|---|
1. | «We Are One (Caligula Love Theme)» | Toni Biggs | Lydia Van Huston | 3:18 |
No. | Title | Writer(s) | Vocals | Length |
---|---|---|---|---|
1. | «We Are One (Caligula Love Theme Dance Version)» | Toni Biggs | Lydia Van Huston | 4:33 |
No. | Title | Writer(s) | Length |
---|---|---|---|
1. | «Wood Sequence (Intro/Spartacus/Romeo & Juliet)» | Paul Clemente, Aram Khatchaturian, Sergei Prokofiev | 4:20 |
2. | «Caligula & Ennia (Anfitrione)» | Paul Clemente | 1:52 |
3. | «Caligula’s Dance (Marziale)» | Paul Clemente | 1:20 |
4. | «Drusilla’s Bedroom (Spartacus)» | Aram Khatchaturian | 0:55 |
5. | «Isis Pool (Oblio)» | Paul Clemente | 4:15 |
6. | «Livia/Proculus Wedding (Movimento)» | Paul Clemente | 3:37 |
7. | «Caesonia’s Dance (Primitivo)» | Paul Clemente | 1:25 |
No. | Title | Writer(s) | Length |
---|---|---|---|
1. | «Drusilla’s Death — Main Theme (Spartacus)» | Aram Khatchaturian | 5:48 |
2. | «Orgy On Ship (Cinderella/Midnight Waltz)» | Sergei Prokofiev | 1:52 |
3. | «Orgy On Ship — Part II (Orgia)» | Paul Clemente | 2:28 |
4. | «Battle Of Britain (Spartan War)» | John Leach | 1:26 |
5. | «Play/Stadium (Equiziana)» | Paul Clemente | 2:47 |
6. | «Caligula’s Death (Romeo & Juliet)» | Sergei Prokofiev | 3:32 |
7. | «Reprise (Spartacus [Main Theme])» | Aram Khatchaturian | 0:45 |
Release[edit]
Helen Mirren was cast as Caesonia, wife of Caligula. Mirren described the film as an «irresistible mix of art and genitals».[40]
An edited version of the film had a limited run in a small town near Forlì, Italy before opening in Rome on Sunday, November 11, 1979.[41] In Rome, it was the highest-grossing film of the weekend, with a gross of $59,950 from 6 theaters.[42][41] The film was confiscated by Italian police on November 15 with the Pubblico Ministero calling many scenes in the film «flagrantly obscene».[41]
In the United States, Guccione refused to submit Caligula to the MPAA because he did not want the film to receive a rating—even X—which he considered to be «demeaning».[9] Instead, Guccione applied his own «Mature Audiences» rating to the film, instructing theater owners not to admit anyone under the age of 18.[43] The film premiered in the United States on 1 February 1980, at the Trans Lux East Theatre, which Guccione had rented exclusively to screen the film; he changed the theater’s name to Penthouse East.[8]
Rather than leasing prints to exhibitors, the distributor rented theaters that specialized in foreign and art films for the purpose of screening Caligula exclusively[44] in order to keep the film out of theaters that showed pornographic films.[43][44][45] In 1981, the Brazilian Board of Censors approved the establishment of special theaters to screen In the Realm of the Senses and Caligula because they were international box office hits.[46]
Caligula grossed US$23 million[10] at the box office.[10][47] The film was a financial success in France, Germany, Switzerland, Belgium, the Netherlands and Japan.[38] A 105-minute R-rated version without the explicit sexual material was released in 1981.[23][48][49]
The script was adapted into a novelization written by William Johnston under the pseudonym William Howard.[15]
Legal problems[edit]
In 1979, when Guccione tried to import the film’s footage into the U.S., customs officials seized it. Federal officials did not declare the film to be obscene.[45] When the film was released in New York City, the anti-pornography organization Morality in Media unsuccessfully filed a lawsuit against these federal officials.[45]
In Boston, authorities seized the film.[45] Penthouse took legal action, partly because Guccione thought the legal challenges and moral controversies would provide «the kind of [marketing] coverage money can never buy».[50] Penthouse won the case when a Boston Municipal Court ruled that Caligula had passed the Miller test and was not obscene.[50] While the Boston judge said the film «lacked artistic and scientific value» because of its depiction of sex and considered it to «[appeal] to prurient interests», he said the film’s depiction of ancient Rome contained political values which enabled it to pass the Miller test in its depiction of corruption in ancient Rome, which dramatized the political theme that «absolute power corrupts absolutely».[25] A Madison, Wisconsin, district attorney declined an anti-pornography crusader’s request to prevent the release of Caligula on the basis that «the most offensive portions of the film are those explicitly depicting violent, and not sexual conduct, which is not in any way prohibited by the criminal law».[25]
Atlanta prosecutors threatened legal action if the film was to be screened in the city, but experts testified in court on behalf of the film, and Atlanta, too, declared that the film was not obscene.[45] Citizens for Decency through Law, a private watchdog group that protested against films that it deemed immoral, sought to prevent the film’s exhibition in Fairlawn, Ohio, on the grounds that it would be a «public nuisance», leading Penthouse to withdraw the film from exhibition there to avoid another trial.[25] CDL’s lawyer advised against attempting to prosecute Penthouse for obscenity and instead recommended a civil proceeding, because the film would not be placed against the Miller test.[25] The Penthouse attorney described the Fairlawn events as being driven by conservative morality reinforced by Ronald Reagan’s presidential victory, stating: «Apparently, these extremists have interpreted a change by the administration to mean a clarion call for a mandate to shackle the public’s mind again.»[25] The uncut film was granted a certificate by the British Board of Film Classification in 2008. The film was banned in Australia, where it continues to be banned in its uncut form as of 2014.[51]
In 1981, Anneka Di Lorenzo, who played Messalina, sued Guccione, claiming sexual harassment. In 1990, after protracted litigation, a New York state court awarded her $60,000 in compensatory damages and $4 million in punitive damages. On appeal, the court vacated the award, ruling that punitive damages were not allowed by the law governing the case.[52]
Contemporary reviews[edit]
Caligula received generally negative reviews. The films holds a 22% rating on Rotten Tomatoes based on thirty-two reviews. The site’s consensus states: «Endlessly perverse and indulgent, Caligula throws in hardcore sex every time the plot threatens to get interesting.»[53] Roger Ebert gave it zero stars, calling it «sickening, utterly worthless, shameful trash». Ebert wrote: «In the two hours of this film that I saw, there were no scenes of joy, natural pleasure, or good sensual cheer. There was, instead, a nauseating excursion into base and sad fantasies.»[54] It was one of the few films Ebert ever walked out of—he walked out 2 hours into its 170-minute length after feeling «disgusted and unspeakably depressed».[54] He and Gene Siskel selected the film as one of their «dogs of the year» in a 1980 episode of Sneak Previews.[55] Hank Werba of Variety described the film as a «moral holocaust» in his review.[56][57] Rex Reed called Caligula «a trough of rotten swill».[31] Jay Scott, reviewing Caligula for The Globe and Mail, said, «Caligula doesn’t really work on any level».[58] Scott unfavourably compared Caligula with In the Realm of the Senses, describing the latter film as a better treatment of extreme sexuality.[58] Scott’s review went on to say «Rome would seem to be at least as fecund a territory for the cinematic exploration of sex, death and money, as pre-war Japan … but what’s missing from Caligula, which is rife with all three, is any connective tissue (also any point of view, any thought, any meaning)».[58] Scott concluded his review by claiming the whole film’s production was «a boondoggle of landmark proportions».[58] New York critic David Denby described the film as «an infinitely degraded version of Fellini Satyricon«.[33] Tom Milne (Monthly Film Bulletin) stated that the film was «by no means so awesomely bad as most critics have been pleased to report—but pretty bad all the same» and found the film to be «notable chiefly for the accuracy with which it reflects [Caligula’s] anonymity».[59]
Legacy[edit]
Caligula continued to garner negative reception long after its release, though it has been reappraised by some critics, and attempts have been made to reconstruct a version of the film that more closely resembles the visions of either Tinto Brass or Gore Vidal. Review aggregate Rotten Tomatoes gives the film a score of 22% based on 32 reviews, with an average rating of 3.9/10. The site’s critical consensus reads: «Endlessly perverse and indulgent, Caligula throws in hardcore sex every time the plot threatens to get interesting.»[53] Leslie Halliwell said Caligula was «a vile curiosity of interest chiefly to sado-masochists».[60] Time Out London called it «a dreary shambles».[61] Positive criticism of the film came from Moviehole reviewer Clint Morris, who awarded it 3 stars out of 5, calling it «[a] classic in the coolest sense of the word».[53] New Times critic Gregory Weinkauf gave the film 3 out of 5, calling it «Kinda dumb and tacky, but at least it’s a real movie».[53] Arkansas Democrat-Gazette reviewer Philip Martin also gave the film 3 out of 5.[53]
Writers for The Hamilton Spectator and St. Louis Post-Dispatch said Caligula was one of the worst films they’d seen.[62][63] Writing for The A.V. Club, Keith Phipps said, «As a one-of-a-kind marriage of the historical epic and the porn film … Caligula deserves a look. But it might be better to let Guccione’s savagely unpleasant folly fade into the century that spawned it».[64]
Several films were released in the following years as attempts to cash in on Caligula‘s reputation, including Caligula and Messalina (1981), directed by Bruno Mattei and Caligula… The Untold Story (1982), directed by Joe D’Amato. Like Caligula, D’Amato’s film exists in several softcore and hardcore versions.[65]
In 1985, the hardcore version of Caligula was broadcast in France on Canal+, making it the first film with unsimulated sex scenes ever shown on French television. The film, which had been broadcast as a test, became the starting point of Canal+’s tradition of showing one pornographic film at midnight every month.[66][67]
Retrospective recognition[edit]
Caligula has been described as a «cult classic» by William Hawes in a book about the film.[13] Helen Mirren has defended her involvement in the making of Caligula and even described the final product of the film as «an irresistible mix of art and genitals».[40] In 2005, artist Francesco Vezzoli produced a fake trailer for an alleged remake called Gore Vidal’s Caligula as a promotion for Versace’s new line of accessories; the remake was to star Helen Mirren as «the Empress Tiberius», Gerard Butler as Chaerea, Milla Jovovich as Drusilla, Courtney Love as Caligula, and Karen Black as Agrippina the Elder and featuring an introduction by Gore Vidal. The fake trailer was screened worldwide, including New York City’s Whitney Museum of American Art’s 2006 Whitney Biennial.[68]
Leonardo DiCaprio has cited Caligula as an influence on his performance as Jordan Belfort in The Wolf of Wall Street.[69]
Reconstruction attempts[edit]
In 2007, Caligula was released on DVD and Blu-ray in an «Imperial Edition»,[70] which featured the unrated theatrical release version and a new version featuring alternative sequencing from the original theatrical release and without the explicit sexual content shot by Guccione, marking the first attempt to reconstruct the film into a version closer to Brass’s intentions. This edition also includes audio commentaries featuring Malcolm McDowell and Helen Mirren, and interviews with the cast and crew.[71]
In February 2018, Penthouse announced that a new cut of the film was being edited by Alexander Tuschinski.[72] Tuschinski will use 85 minutes of Brass’s original workprint and edit the remainder of the film himself.[73] Brass’s family supports Tuschinski’s effort, but it remains unconfirmed if Brass will be directly involved with the edit.[74] However, the edit is an attempt to realize Brass’s original vision for the film.[16]
In July 2018, Alexander Tuschinski released his documentary Mission: Caligula on Vimeo. The film explores his relationship with Caligula, the process of reconstructing Brass’s vision, and Penthouse CEO Kelly Holland’s backing of the project.[16]
In 2020, another version of the film was announced to be released in the fall of that year, edited by E. Elias Merhige to follow more closely Gore Vidal’s original screenplay instead of Tinto Brass’s or Bob Guccione’s vision.[75]
See also[edit]
- List of films considered the worst
- Unsimulated sex
References[edit]
- ^ William Hawes (2008). Caligula and the Fight for Artistic Freedom: The Making, Marketing and Impact of the Bob Guccione Film. McFarland. ISBN 978-0-7864-5240-8.
- ^ The film’s titles credit both Baragli and «The Production», a credit possibly referring to Bob Guccione and his production assistants, with editing.
- ^ a b c William Hawes (2008). Caligula and the Fight for Artistic Freedom: The Making, Marketing and Impact of the Bob Guccione Film. McFarland. p. 233. ISBN 978-0-7864-5240-8.
- ^ a b c d e Kristopher Spencer (2008). Film and Television Scores, 1950–1979: A Critical Survey by Genre. McFarland. p. 125. ISBN 978-0-7864-5228-6.
- ^ Annuario del cinema italiano & audiovisivi (in Italian), Centro di studi di cultura, promozione e difusione del cinema, p. 59, OCLC 34869836
- ^ Anthony Slide (2014). The New Historical Dictionary of the American Film Industry. Routledge. p. 11. ISBN 978-1-135-92554-3.
- ^ William Hawes (2008). Caligula and the Fight for Artistic Freedom: The Making, Marketing and Impact of the Bob Guccione Film. McFarland. p. 195. ISBN 978-0-7864-5240-8.
- ^ a b William Hawes (2008). Caligula and the Fight for Artistic Freedom: The Making, Marketing and Impact of the Bob Guccione Film. McFarland. p. 196. ISBN 978-0-7864-5240-8.
- ^ a b John Heidenry (2002). What Wild Ecstasy. Simon and Schuster. p. 268. ISBN 978-0-7432-4184-7.
- ^ a b c «Caligula box office at the-numbers.com». the-numbers.com.
- ^ What Culture#14 Archived August 6, 2020, at the Wayback Machine: Caligula
- ^ «Film Censorship: Caligula (1979)». Refused-Classification.com. Retrieved June 9, 2012.
- ^ a b Hawes, William (2008). Caligula and the Fight for Artistic Freedom: The Making, Marketing and Impact of the Bob Guccione Film. McFarland. p. 1. ISBN 978-0-7864-5240-8.
- ^ Stephen Prince (1980–1989). A New Pot of Gold: Hollywood Under the Electronic Rainbow. p. 350.
- ^ a b Spencer, David (January–February 2010). «IAMTW’s Grand Master Scribe Award, The Faust, Goes to the Genre’s Most Prolific Practitioner» (PDF). Tied-In: The Newsletter of the International Association of Media Tie-in Writers. Calabasas, California: International Association of Media Tie-in Writers. 4 (1). Archived from the original (PDF) on March 4, 2016. Retrieved August 26, 2015.
- ^ a b c Tuschinski, Alexander (July 26, 2018), Mission: Caligula, retrieved July 27, 2018
- ^ «Caligula MMXX — announcement on website for 2020 re-release». Retrieved January 5, 2020.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y Ernest Volkman (May 1980). «Bob Guccione Caligula Interview from Penthouse May 1980». Penthouse: 112–118, 146–115. Archived from the original on August 8, 2014. Retrieved June 9, 2012.
- ^ Constantine Santas; James M. Wilson; Maria Colavito; Djoymi Baker (2014). The Encyclopedia of Epic Films. Scarecrow Press. p. 115. ISBN 978-0-8108-8248-5.
- ^ a b c «New York Magazine». Newyorkmetro.com. New York Media, LLC: 85. March 26, 1979. ISSN 0028-7369.
- ^ a b c d e f g h John Heidenry (2002). What Wild Ecstasy. Simon and Schuster. p. 266. ISBN 978-0-7432-4184-7.
- ^ a b c «Will the Real Caligula Stand Up?». Time (magazine). January 3, 1977. Archived from the original on January 19, 2008. Retrieved June 9, 2012.
- ^ a b Michael Weldon (1996). The Psychotronic Video Guide To Film. St. Martin’s Press. p. 87. ISBN 978-0-312-13149-4.
- ^ Stanley E. Porter (2007). Dictionary of Biblical Criticism and Interpretation. Routledge. p. 331. ISBN 978-1-134-63556-6.
- ^ a b c d e f g h Stephen Prince (2002). A New Pot of Gold: Hollywood Under the Electronic Rainbow, 1980–1989. University of California Press. pp. 350. ISBN 978-0-520-23266-2.
- ^ a b Constantine Santas; James M. Wilson; Maria Colavito; Djoymi Baker (2014). The Encyclopedia of Epic Films. Scarecrow Press. p. 118. ISBN 978-0-8108-8248-5.
- ^ Brady, Frank (1990) Citizen Welles, London: Hodder & Stoughton. ISBN 9780340513897. p. 563
- ^ Vidal, Gore (1989) «Remembering Orson Welles», New York Review of Books, June 1, 1989
- ^ «Stracult Movie — Therese Ann Savoy» Archived November 1, 2022, at the Wayback Machine, Video Rai TV (July 31, 2012)
- ^ a b William Hawes (2008). Caligula and the Fight for Artistic Freedom: The Making, Marketing and Impact of the Bob Guccione Film. McFarland. p. 105. ISBN 978-0-7864-5240-8.
- ^ a b c Thomas Vinciguerra (September 6, 1999). «Porn Again». nymag.com. Retrieved June 9, 2012.
- ^ a b Jeffrey Richards (2008). Hollywood’s Ancient Worlds. A&C Black. p. 157. ISBN 978-1-84725-007-0.
- ^ a b c «New York Magazine». Newyorkmetro.com. New York Media, LLC: 61. February 25, 1980. ISSN 0028-7369.
- ^ «Analysis and reconstruction of Tinto Brass’ intended version of Caligula (PDF, 15,2 MB, 106 pages)» (PDF). Retrieved September 9, 2014.
- ^ Deborah Cartmell, Ashley D. Polasek, A Companion to the Biopic, John Wiley & Sons Inc, 2019, p. 180
- ^ William Hawes (2008). Caligula and the Fight for Artistic Freedom: The Making, Marketing and Impact of the Bob Guccione Film. McFarland. p. 108. ISBN 978-0-7864-5240-8.
- ^ Howard Hughes (April 30, 2011). Cinema Italiano: The Complete Guide from Classics to Cult. I.B.Tauris, 2011, p. 288. ISBN 9780857730442.
- ^ a b Billboard. Nielsen Business Media, Inc. November 15, 1980. p. 8. ISSN 0006-2510.
- ^ Jerry Osborne (2002). Movie/TV Soundtracks and Original Cast Recordings Price and Reference Guide. Jerry Osborne Enterprises. p. 92. ISBN 978-0-932117-37-3.
- ^ a b William Hawes (2008). Caligula and the Fight for Artistic Freedom: The Making, Marketing and Impact of the Bob Guccione Film. McFarland. p. 191. ISBN 978-0-7864-5240-8.
- ^ a b c «Guccioni, Rossellini ‘Caligula’ Seized As ‘Flagrantly Obscene’«. Variety. November 21, 1979. p. 3.
- ^ «‘Caligula’ Big In Rome Debut, At $59,950; ‘Manhattan’ 44G, 2d». Variety. November 21, 1979. p. 43.
- ^ a b Stephen Vaughn (2006). Freedom and Entertainment: Rating the Movies in an Age of New Media. Cambridge University Press. p. 73. ISBN 978-0-521-85258-6.
- ^ a b Stephen Prince. A New Pot of Gold: Hollywood Under the Electronic Rainbow, 1980–1989. p. 349.
- ^ a b c d e Stephen Vaughn (2006). Freedom and Entertainment: Rating the Movies in an Age of New Media. Cambridge University Press. p. 74. ISBN 978-0-521-85258-6.
- ^ Lisa Shaw; Stephanie Dennison (2014). Brazilian National Cinema. Routledge. p. 100. ISBN 978-1-134-70210-7.
- ^ Joyce L. Vedral (1990). Uncle John’s Third Bathroom Reader. St. Martin’s Press. p. 155. ISBN 978-0-312-04586-9.
- ^ William Hawes (2008). Caligula and the Fight for Artistic Freedom: The Making, Marketing and Impact of the Bob Guccione Film. McFarland. p. 205. ISBN 978-0-7864-5240-8.
- ^ David Welling (2010). Cinema Houston: From Nickelodeon to Megaplex. University of Texas Press. p. 249. ISBN 978-0-292-77398-1.
- ^ a b Stephen Prince (2002). A New Pot of Gold: Hollywood Under the Electronic Rainbow, 1980–1989. University of California Press. pp. 349. ISBN 978-0-520-23266-2.
- ^ Robert Cetti (2014). Offensive to a Reasonable Adult: Film Censorship and Classification in Australia. Robert Cettl. p. 48. ISBN 978-0-9872425-5-6.
- ^ «Marjorie Lee Thoreson A/K/A Anneka Dilorenzo, Appellant-Respondent, V. Penthouse International, Ltd. And Robert C. Guccione, Respondents-Appellants». law.cornell.edu. Retrieved January 19, 2011.
- ^ a b c d e «Caligula (1979)». Rotten Tomatoes. Retrieved July 3, 2014.
- ^ a b Roger Ebert (September 22, 1980). «Caligula». Chicago Sun-Times. Retrieved June 9, 2012.
- ^ «Siskel & Ebert org — Worst of 1980». Archived from the original on January 8, 2018. Retrieved February 1, 2015.
- ^ Werba, Hank (November 21, 1979). «Film Reviews: Caligula». Variety. p. 24.
- ^ «100 Most Controversial Films of All Time».
- ^ a b c d Jay Scott, The Globe and Mail, February 7, 1980.
- ^ Milne, Tom (1980). «Caligula». Monthly Film Bulletin. Vol. 47, no. 552. British Film Institute. p. 232. ISSN 0027-0407.
- ^ Photoplay Magazine, Volume 38, 1987 (p.38)
- ^ «Caligula (1979)». Time Out. Retrieved June 9, 2012.
- ^ «Lowest:100 Really Bad Moments in 20th Century Entertainment». The Hamilton Spectator, July 24, 1999 (p. W17).
- ^ Joe Holleman, «Roman Warriors roam the big screen again». St. Louis Post-Dispatch May 5, 2000 (p. E1).
- ^ Keith Phipps
(April 23, 2002) Caligula Archived November 1, 2022, at the Wayback Machine. The AV Club. Retrieved January 12, 2014. - ^ Grattarola, Franco; Napoli, Andrea (2014). Luce Rossa. La nascita e le prime fasi del cinema pornografico in Italia. Roma: Iacobelli Editore, pp. 278-280
- ^ Du carré blanc au film porno de Canal+, une brève histoire du sexe à la télévision Archived June 1, 2022, at the Wayback Machine, Le Parisien, 30 October 2021
- ^ la recherche du porno perdu Archived June 3, 2022, at the Wayback Machine, Libération, 14 October 2019
- ^ Linda Yablonsky (February 26, 2006). «‘Caligula’ Gives a Toga Party (but No One’s Really Invited)». The New York Times. Retrieved June 9, 2012.
- ^ «Leonardo DiCaprio channelled Caligula for Wolf of Wall Street». WENN.com. December 18, 2013. Archived from the original on December 8, 2015.
- ^ Monica S. Cyrino (2013). Screening Love and Sex in the Ancient World. Palgrave Macmillan. p. 148. ISBN 978-1-137-29960-4.
- ^ Martin M. Winkler (2009). Cinema and Classical Texts: Apollo’s New Light. Cambridge University Press. p. 32. ISBN 978-0-521-51860-4.
- ^ AVN, Mark Kernes. «Penthouse Event Previews New Version of Classic Film ‘Caligula’ | AVN». AVN. Retrieved March 12, 2018.
- ^ «Film-Analyses / Caligula». alexander-tuschinski.de. Retrieved March 12, 2018.
- ^ Archived at Ghostarchive and the Wayback Machine: MISSION CALIGULA Q&A at Hollywood Reel Independent Film Festival — February 26, 2018, February 28, 2018, retrieved March 12, 2018
- ^ «Caligula MMXX — announcement on website for 2020 re-release». Retrieved January 5, 2020.
External links[edit]
«Калигула»: история создания скандального пеплума
Автор:
26 февраля 2017 17:26
Вполне возможно, что «Калигула» Тинто Брасса является одним из самых противоречивых и спорных кинофильмов в истории кино. Наряду с такими лентами, как «Куколка» Элиа Казана, «Трахни меня», «Рождение нации» Гриффита и «Заводной апельсин» Стэнли Кубрика.
.
Эротический пеплум (пеплум — жанр масштабных исторических фильмов с использованием античных или библейских сюжетов) предлагает зрителю познакомиться с не самыми привлекательными событиями эпохи правления Римской империи. В этой ленте тщательно подобраны все извращения, которыми прославился император Калигула: его богохульная сексуальная страсть к собственной сестре, его брак с самой известной римской путаной и изобретательно бесчеловечные способы уничтожения тех, кто осмеливался ему перечить.
Этот проект странным образом объединил в единое целое грандов мирового кинематографа — Малкольма Макдауэлла, Питера О’Тула, сэра Джона Гилгуда и шекспировскую актрису Хелен Миррен — с полным комплектом «звезд» журнала Penthouse. История создания этой историко-эротической драмы породила много слухов, скандалов и сделала фильм знаменитым задолго до его фактического появления на экранах кинотеатров.
Самая первая, предварительная, версия сценария принадлежит перу знаменитого итальянского кинематографиста Роберто Росселлини. Написана она была еще в 1972 году. Однако сам Роберто эту идею развивать не стал, а подарил сырой материал своему племяннику Франко. Тот, в свою очередь, не обладая особыми талантами, но имея за плечами продюсерский опыт («Теорема» и «Декамерон» Пазолини), связался с именитым писателем, историком и сценаристом Гором Видалом («Бен-Гур»). Распределив между собой роли в будущем проекте (Франко — продюсер, Видал — автор сценария), эти двое отправились на поиски толстого кошелька, способного претворить их замыслы в жизнь. Далеко идти не пришлось, ибо Гор Видал, нередко пописывавший проницательные статьи на злобу дня в журнал Penthouse, очень кстати вспомнил о его основателе Бобе Гуччионе.
Гор Видал и Боб Гуччионе.
Боб Гуччионе, гениальный бизнесмен, основавший в 1965 году в Лондоне эротический журнал Penthouse, уже в 1969 году выпустил первый сентябрьский выпуск на родине своего непосредственного конкурента Хью Хефнера (Playboy). Боб уже не в первый раз вкладывал свои средства в кинематограф. В частности, его финансовые вливания были зафиксированы в таких лентах, как «Китайский квартал» (1974) Романа Полански, «Самый длинный ярд» (1974) Роберта Олдрича и «День саранчи» (1975) Джона Шлезингера. Однако все эти работы не тешили самолюбия и тщеславия Гуччионе, ибо его имя не фигурировало в титрах, а сам он выступал лишь в роли «позорного», хоть и богатого спонсора. Поэтому на этот раз Боб дал согласие на свое участие только на условии, что оно перестанет быть мнимым. Эти требования он подкрепил немалой по тем временам суммой в 17,5 миллионов долларов, которые к моменту официального релиза картины в 1979 году превратились в еще более внушительные 22 миллиона.
Первые 200 тысяч ушли к Видалу, который приступил к обработке версии Росселлини. Ему также пообещали десять процентов от сборов. Весной 1975 года у фильма появился и режиссер. Несмотря на то что Гуччионе был плохо знаком с Тинто Брассом, его картина «Салон Китти» убедила продюсера в правильности сделанного выбора, ибо их с Тинто взгляд на киноэротику был очень схож. «Калигула», по мнению Гуччионе, должен был стать древнеримским вариантом «Салона Китти».
Мир и согласие недолго сопутствовали съемочному процессу. Для начала разругались Брасс и Видал. Уже в июне 1976 года Гор Видал покинул проект из-за разногласий по вопросу сценария, настаивая, чтобы его имя убрали из титров. Гуччионе не стал удерживать строптивого писателя, но, само собой, лишил его заветных десяти процентов. Видал в отместку в 1977 году даже подал в суд на создателей ленты, пытаясь вычеркнуть упоминание о себе из грядущего фильма, однако потерпел фиаско.
Декорации стали монтировать в июне 1975 года под руководством маститого художественного директора Данило Донати, имевшего в послужном списке «Оскар» за «Ромео и Джульетту» Франко Дзеффирелли (в 1976 году он получит еще один за «Казанову» Федерико Феллини). Постройки отличались невиданной щедростью, как, впрочем, и костюмы. На одного императора приходилось двадцать шесть различных одеяний, а всего их было сшито более трех с половиной тысяч. Съемки планировалось провести в Риме на Dear Studios, там же, где в начале шестидесятых американцы снимали свой знаменитый пеплум «Клеопатра» с Элизабет Тейлор. Остальные эпизоды решили отснять в близлежащих локациях.
Подбор актеров, он же кастинг, стартовал в 1976 году. Тогда в Рим прибыли первые звезды — Джон Гилгуд и Питер О’Тул. Гилгуду сразу же предложили роль Тиберия, однако актера смутила откровенная порнография в сценарии, и он поспешил отказаться, после чего получил от Видала гневное (и весьма грубое) письмо. О’Тул, в свою очередь, жеманничать не стал и предложение принял, агентам же Гилгуда с трудом удалось уговорить его на второстепенную и меньшую по объему роль близкого друга Тиберия, сенатора Нерва. Своими воспоминаниями по поводу съемок «Калигулы» актер позднее поделился с читателями в своей автобиографии «Актер и его время». Главная же роль досталась популярному британскому исполнителю Малкольму Макдауэллу, чье присутствие в кадре 156-минутной ленты составило около девяноста процентов.
На место банально струсившей Марии Шнайдер («Последнее танго в Париже») на роль сестры Калигулы, Друзиллы, в последнюю минуту взяли Терезу Энн Савой. Она, как и Джон Стайнер, сыгравший ее мужа Лонгина, перешла в картину напрямую из «Салона Китти». Наконец, на роль последней, четвертой, жены императора, Цезонии, пригласили шекспировскую актрису Хелен Миррен, а на роль Макро — известного итальянского футболиста Гуидо Маннари. Плюс тринадцать девушек Penthouse. Общий актерский состав фильма нигде не публиковался, но, по непроверенным данным, в картине поучаствовало до двух с половиной тысяч человек
Вокруг съемок была создана таинственная атмосфера. Дошло до того, что площадку на Dear Studios патрулировали вооруженные охранники.
Представители СМИ, само собой, тоже были вне игры, за исключением редких счастливчиков. Несколько американских репортеров даже попытались устроиться на фильм статистами, но вовремя были вычислены. Закрыв съемки от посторонних глаз, Гуччионе преследовал лишь одну цель — подогреть интерес публики к проекту. Ему это удалось сполна, ибо жадные до сенсаций журналисты, не зная подробностей, сами придумывали жареные факты: зоофилические сцены, оргии с участием сотен людей, ритуальные убийства животных, совращение малолетних и прочие несусветные непотребства.
По словам Пьернико Солинаса, конфликтов на съемках было выше крыши. Основной причиной являлась слишком большая концентрация волевых личностей. Тот же Росселлини постоянно сталкивал лбами Брасса и художника картины, Донати. Франко настаивал, чтобы Брасс начинал работать в недостроенных декорациях, ибо они выбивались из графика. Несмотря на то что Росселлини и Гуччионе оба были сопродюсерами, каждый контролировал свою территорию, причем основная масса негатива приходится на плечи Франко, которого впоследствии даже обвинили в нецелевом использовании средств.
Съемки начались 5 августа 1976 года, и к декабрю Тинто Брасс наработал 120 миль кинопленки. Тут у него начались кардинальные разногласия с Гуччионе. По словам Боба, у Брасса было весьма странное чувство юмора: вместо пышнотелых красоток «Пентхауса» он так и норовил вставить в кадр толстых старых теток. Декорации, построенные Донати, Тинто использовал очень скупо и вообще избегал компромиссов, предпочитая настаивать на своем до упора. В конце концов вся съемочная группа поделилась на два лагеря: с одной стороны Брасс, с другой — Гуччионе и часть актеров.
Впрочем, сами актеры тоже вели себя не очень организованно. О’Тул постоянно опаздывал, а если приходил вовремя, то очень долго гримировался. Прекрасный актер Макдауэлл оказался редкостным скупердяем, подсчитывая каждую копейку, потраченную на съемки из собственного кармана. Макдауэлл водил дружбу с Брассом, потому что им было легче манипулировать. Гилгуд часто высказывал подозрения о том, что фильм вообще не выйдет в свет, но от гонорара отказываться не спешил. Тем не менее спустя восемнадцать долгих месяцев Брасс торжественно сообщил об окончании съемок.
Гуччионе остался недоволен. Он посчитал, что спешка помешала снять некоторые эротические сцены в нужном визуальном исполнении. Но заставлять Брасса переделывать работу он не стал, ибо это привело бы к ненужным пересудам и увеличению сроков, а значит, к дополнительным расходам. Вместо этого в самом начале 1977 года Боб, прихватив с собой моделей, костяк съемочной группы и помощника Джанкарло Луи, буквально пробрался тайком на площадку и доснял ряд сексуальных эпизодов, которых, по его мнению, недоставало в фильме.
Если вы думаете, что дополнительные эпизоды, снятые Гуччионе втихаря, сильно отличались от того материала, что наснимал Тинто, вы ошибаетесь. Брасс успел нарисовать такие картины, что лесбийские игры подопечных Боба казались легкой эротикой. Тем не менее характер фильма не позволял монтировать его в открытую в строгой Италии, поэтому километры пленки перевезли на Туманный Альбион.
Все дальнейшее напоминает латиноамериканский сериал. Придя на работу в конце февраля 1977 года, Брасс и его помощники выяснили, что уволены. Разногласия между ним и Гуччионе с Луи достигли своего апогея. Гуччионе нужен был большой и быстрый порнохит, тогда как Тинто мыслил на долгосрочную перспективу. Увидев такое отношение, Брасс тут же оформил против Боба судебный иск. Тот, в свою очередь, подал ответный иск на Тинто Брасса, который уже судился с Гором Видалом, подавшим в суд на всех и вся.
В такой обстановке в Лондоне начался процесс монтажа. Для этого поначалу наняли специалиста, Рассела Ллойда, но затем попрощались и с ним. Судя по всему, причиной стали те самые дополнительно отснятые сцены, которые ни Брасс, ни Ллойд не согласились включать в фильм.
Каким-то образом к маю ленту смонтировали, однако проблемы нарастали как снежный ком. Сначала профсоюзы, пронюхав об истинном содержании исторического опуса, призвали своих членов бойкотировать фильм. Затем подтвердились опасения Гуччионе насчет компании Technicolor, в которой таки отказались проявлять негатив пленки, сославшись на ее порнографический контент и попытки со стороны полиции конфисковать отснятый материал.
В связи с такой постановкой вопроса Гуччионе вынужден был продолжить монтаж уже в Париже, а проявка прошла вообще за океаном, в Нью-Йорке, куда фильм провозили под другим названием, опасаясь гонений со стороны властей. Судебные дрязги потихоньку стихли, и в мае 1979 года на фестивале в Каннах состоялась долгожданная премьера. Фестивальная версия была длиннее, чем вариант, вышедший в официальный прокат позднее, в сентябре. Но полиция все равно запретила показ ленты спустя пару дней, несмотря на все бумажки и разрешения, полученные продюсерами.
В США Гуччионе отказался представить картину на рейтинговую комиссию, так как прекрасно осознавал, что, кроме Х, она ничего не получит, а следовательно, автоматически станет товаром для порнорынка. Вместо этого он присвоил ленте рейтинг МА (Mature Audiences — только для взрослых) и выставил билеты по семь с половиной долларов за штуку вместо обычных пяти, логично полагая, что желающие посмотреть его фильм, снимавшийся четыре года с бюджетом в 22 миллиона, придут в кино и за эти деньги.
Боб вообще демонстрировал чудеса предпринимательства, когда отреставрировал целый кинотеатр специально для показа «Калигулы». Кинокритиков он, само собой, недолюбливал, поэтому решил, что раз уж запретить им смотреть свое кино он не может, то пущай, мерзавцы, платят семь с половиной долларов, как все. И отменил пригласительные для прессы. Пресса не замедлила вернуть должок. Самым разгромным был отзыв Рекса Рида из «Нью-Йорк таймс».
Но злые языки не мешали картине собирать кассу. За восемнадцать дней в одном лишь кинотеатре «Калигула» заработал 225 тысяч долларов. Когда же лента все-таки вышла в широкий прокат, посещаемость сеансов била все рекорды.
По самым скромным оценкам, кино- и видеопрокат «Калигулы» принесли Гуччионе порядка 100 миллионов долларов. Это в очередной раз доказало его предприимчивость, а сам фильм сделало одним из самых успешных независимых проектов в истории кинематографа. Впоследствии часть прибыли легла в основу Penthouse Casino в Лас-Вегасе.
История создания «Калигулы» еще раз подтвердила неоспоримый факт — иногда грамотная и хорошо спланированная шумиха вокруг фильма, да и вообще вокруг любого произведения искусства или события, намного превосходит по стоимости и ценности само оригинальное явление, событие или произведение. С творческой точки зрения лента Тинто Брасса отнюдь не является шедевром, но ажиотаж и атмосфера таинственности вокруг нее так или иначе сделали свое черное дело.
Эта картина снималась ради скандала, и в этом она явно преуспела. Но не более.
У Тинто Брасса после этого фильма был почти беспроигрышный шанс стать воистину великим режиссером, но…
Или не сложилось, или лень, или не был он никогда глубоким.. Кто его знает ?!
А было ли желание ?
У меня всё. Спасибо, Смотрящим и Читающим ! Источник текста: http://ynik.info/2011/08/13/kaligula_istor…go_pepluma.html Фотографии : просторы Сети. Отбор и оформление мои.
Еще крутые истории!
«Калигула» Тинто Брасса является одним из самых противоречивых и спорных фильмов в истории кино. Наряду с такими лентами, как «Куколка» Элиа Казана, «Рождение нации» Гриффита и «Заводной апельсин» Стэнли Кубрика. Эротический пеплум (пеплум — жанр масштабных исторических фильмов с использованием античных или библейских сюжетов) предлагает зрителю познакомиться не с самыми привлекательными событиями эпохи правления Римской империи.
В ленте тщательно подобраны все извращения, которыми прославился император Калигула: его богохульная сексуальная страсть к родной сестре, его брак с самой известной римской путаной и изобретательно-бесчеловечные способы уничтожения тех, кто осмеливался ему перечить. Проект странным образом объединил в единое целое знаменитостей мирового кинематографа: Малкольма МакДауэлла, Питера О’Тула, сэра Джона Гилгуда и шекспировскую актрису Хелен Миррен — с полным комплектом «звезд» журнала «Penthouse». История создания этой историко-эротической драмы породила много слухов, скандалов и сделала фильм знаменитым задолго до его фактического появления на экранах.
Самая первая версия сценария принадлежит перу знаменитого итальянского кинематографиста Роберто Росселлини. Однако сам Роберто идею развивать не стал, а подарил сырой материал племяннику Франко. Тот, в свою очередь, не обладая особыми талантами, но имея за плечами продюсерский опыт («Теорема» и «Декамерон» Пазолини), связался с именитым писателем, историком и сценаристом Гором Видалом («Бен-Гур»). Распределив между собой роли в будущем проекте, эти двое отправились на поиски толстого кошелька, способного претворить их замыслы в жизнь. Далеко идти не пришлось, ибо Гор Видал, нередко пописывавший проницательные статьи на злобу дня в журнал «Penthouse», очень кстати вспомнил об его основателе Бобе Гуччионе.
Боб Гуччионе, основатель и издатель журнала «Пентхауз»
Боб Гуччионе, гениальный бизнесмен, основавший в 1965 эротический журнал «Penthouse» в Лондоне, уже в сентябре 1969 издал первый выпуск на родине своего непосредственного конкурента Хью Хефнера («Playboy»). Боб уже не в первый раз вкладывался в кино. Его финансовые средства были зафиксированы в лентах «Китайский квартал» Полански, «Самый длинный ярд» Олдрича и «День саранчи» Шлезингера. Однако все эти работы не тешили самолюбия Гуччионе, ведь его имя не фигурировало в титрах, а сам он выступал лишь в роли «позорного», хоть и богатого, спонсора. Поэтому на этот раз Боб дал согласие на свое участие только при условии, что оно перестанет быть мнимым. Эти требования он подкрепил немалой по тем временам суммой в 17,5 миллионов долларов, которые к моменту премьеры фильма в 1979 превратились в еще более внушительные 22 миллиона.
Первые 200 тысяч ушли Видалу, который приступил к обработке версии Росселлини. Ему также пообещали 10% от сборов. Весной 1975 у фильма появился и режиссер. И хотя Гуччионе был плохо знаком с Тинто Брассом, его «Салон Китти» убедил продюсера в правильности выбора: их с Тинто взгляд на эротику был очень схож.
Мир и согласие недолго сопутствовали съемочному процессу. Для начала разругались Брасс и Видал. Уже в июне 1976 последний покинул проект, настаивая, чтобы его имя убрали из титров. Гуччионе не стал удерживать строптивого писателя, но, само собой, лишил его заветных 10%. Видал, в отместку, год спустя подал в суд на создателей, пытаясь вычеркнуть упоминание о себе из грядущего фильма, однако потерпел фиаско.
Декорации стали монтировать в июне 1975 под руководством маститого художественного директора Данило Донати, имевшего в послужном списке Оскар за «Ромео и Джульетту» Дзеффирелли (в 1976 он получит еще один за «Казанову» Феллини). Постройки отличались невиданной щедростью, как, впрочем, и костюмы. На одного императора приходилось 26 различных одеяний, а всего их было сшито более 3,5 тысяч. Съемки фильма планировалось провести в Риме, там же, где в начале 60-х американцы снимали свой знаменитый пеплум «Клеопатра» с Элизабет Тейлор.
Подбор актеров стартовал в 1976. Тогда в Рим прибыли первые звезды — Джон Гилгуд и Питер О’Тул. Гилгуду предложили роль Тиберия, однако актера смутила откровенная порнография в сценарии и он поспешил отказаться. О’Тул, в свою очередь, жеманничать не стал и предложение принял, агентам же Гилгуда с трудом удалось уговорить его на второстепенную роль близкого друга Тиберия, сенатора Нерва. Главная роль досталась популярному британскому исполнителю Малкольму МакДауэллу, чье присутствие в кадре 156-минутной ленты составило около 90%.
Малкольм МакДауэлл и Тереза Энн Савой, кадр из фильма «Калигула»
На место струсившей Марии Шнайдер («Последнее танго в Париже»), на роль сестры Калигулы, Друзиллы, в последнюю минуту взяли Терезу Энн Савой. Она, как и Джон Стайнер, сыгравший ее мужа Лонгина, перешла в картину напрямую из «Салона Китти». Наконец на роль последней жены императора, Цезонии, пригласили шекспировскую актрису Хелен Миррен, а на роль Макро — известного футболиста Гуидо Маннари. Плюс 13 девушек «Penthouse». Общий актерский состав фильма нигде не публиковался, но по неподтвержденным данным в картине поучаствовало до 2 500 человек.
Съемки были окутаны тайной. Дошло до того, что съемочную площадку патрулировали вооруженные охранники. Представители СМИ тоже были вне игры, за исключением редких счастливчиков. Несколько американских репортеров попытались устроиться на фильм статистами, но были вычислены.
Закрыв съемки от посторонних глаз, Гуччионе преследовал лишь одну цель — подогреть интерес публики к проекту. Ему это удалось сполна, ибо жадные до сенсаций журналисты, не зная подробностей, сами придумывали «жареные факты»: зоофилические сцены, оргии с участием сотен людей, ритуальные убийства животных, совращение малолетних и прочую откровенную чушь.
Съемки начались 5 августа 1976, и к декабрю Брасс наработал 120 миль кинопленки. Тут у него начались кардинальные разногласия с Гуччионе. По словам Боба, у режиссера было весьма странное чувство юмора: вместо пышнотелых красоток Пентхауса он так и норовил вставить в кадр толстых старых теток. Декорации, понастроенные Донати, Тинто использовал очень скупо и вообще избегал компромиссов, предпочитая настаивать на своём до упора. В итоге вся съемочная группа поделилась на два лагеря: с одной стороны — Брасс, с другой — Гуччионе и часть актеров.
Актеры тоже вели себя не очень организованно. О’Тул постоянно опаздывал, а если приходил вовремя, то очень долго гримировался или репетировал. Прекрасный актер МакДауэлл оказался редкостным скупердяем, подсчитывая каждую копейку, потраченную на съемки из собственного кармана. Гилгуд часто высказывал подозрения о том, что фильм вообще не выйдет в свет, но от гонорара отказываться не спешил. Тем не менее спустя 18 долгих месяцев Брасс торжественно сообщил об окончании съемок.
Гуччионе остался недоволен, хотя и считал, что спешка помешала снять ряд эротических сцен в нужном визуальном ракурсе. Но заставлять Брасса переделывать работу он не стал: вместо этого Боб, прихватив с собой моделей и часть съемочной группы, пробрался тайком на площадку и доснял ряд сексуальных эпизодов, которых, по его мнению, недоставало в фильме.
Если вы думаете, что дополнительные эпизоды, снятые Гуччионе втихаря, сильно отличались от того материала, что наснимал Тинто, вы ошибаетесь: Брасс успел нарисовать такие картины, что лесбийские игры подопечных Боба казались легкой эротикой. Однако характер фильма не позволял монтировать его открыто в чопорной Италии, поэтому километры пленки перевезли в Англию.
Всё дальнейшее напоминает латиноамериканский сериал. В конце февраля 1977 Брасс и его помощники выяснили, что уволены. Разногласия между ним и Гуччионе достигли своего апогея. Порномагнату нужен был большой и быстрый хит, тогда как Тинто мыслил на долгосрочную перспективу. В гневе Брасс тут же оформил против Боба судебный иск. Тот, в свою очередь, подал ответный иск на Тинто Брасса, который уже судился с Гором Видалом, подавшим в суд на всех и вся.
Затем профсоюзы, пронюхав об истинном содержании исторического опуса, призвали своих членов бойкотировать фильм. Подтвердились и опасения Гуччионе насчет компании Technicolor, в которой наотрез отказались проявлять негатив пленки, сославшись на ее порнографический контент. Продюсер вынужден был продолжить монтаж в Париже, а проявка прошла вообще в Нью-Йорке, куда фильм провозили под другим названием, опасаясь гонений со стороны властей.
Судебные дрязги потихоньку стихли, и в мае 1979 на фестивале в Каннах состоялась долгожданная премьера. Фестивальная версия была длиннее, чем вариант, вышедший в официальный прокат позднее, в сентябре. Но полиция всё равно запретила показ ленты спустя пару дней, несмотря на все бумажки и разрешения, полученные продюсерами.
В США Гуччионе отказался представить картину на рейтинговую комиссию, т.к. прекрасно осознавал, что кроме Х она ничего не получит, а следовательно, автоматически станет товаром для порнорынка. Вместо этого он присвоил ленте рейтинг МА (Mature Audiences — «Только для взрослых») и выставил билеты по 7,50 $ за штуку, вместо обычных 5 $, полагая, что желающие посмотреть его фильм придут в кино и за эти деньги.
Боб вообще демонстрировал чудеса предпринимательства, когда отреставрировал целый кинотеатр специально для показа «Калигулы». Кинокритиков он недолюбливал, поэтому решил, что раз уж запретить им смотреть свое кино он не может, то пущай, мерзавцы, платят 7,50 $, как все. И отменил пригласительные для прессы. Пресса не замедлила вернуть должок. Самым разгромным был отзыв New York Times. Но злые языки не мешали картине собирать кассу. За 18 дней в одном лишь кинотеатре «Калигула» заработал 225 тыс. Когда же лента всё-таки вышла в широкий прокат, посещаемость сеансов била все рекорды.
По самым скромным оценкам, прокат «Калигулы» принес Гуччионе порядка 100 миллионов долларов. Это в очередной раз доказало его предприимчивость, а сам фильм сделало одним из самых успешных независимых проектов в истории кино. Впоследствии часть прибыли легла в основу Penthouse Casino в Лас-Вегасе.
История создания «Калигулы» еще раз подтвердила: иногда грамотная и хорошо спланированная шумиха вокруг фильма, да и вообще вокруг любого произведения искусства или события, намного превосходит по стоимости и ценности само явление/событие/произведение. С творческой точки зрения лента Тинто Брасса отнюдь не является шедевром, но ажиотаж и атмосфера таинственности вокруг нее, так или иначе, сделали свое «черное» дело. Эта картина снималась ради скандала, и в этом она явно преуспела.
См.также:
Самые сексуальные кино-сцены всех времен и народов
7 фильмов, которые запретила американская цензура
«Глубокая глотка», мафия и СПИД — какой была «Золотая эпоха порнографии»
Гибель фильма «Шоугерлз»
«Новые амазонки»: что вырезала цензура и над чем хохотал Горбачёв
Немножко шокирую сейчас аудиторию.
Речь идет об одном пеплуме (весьма известном в прошлые годы).
«Кали́гула» — эпический эротический пеплум Тинто Брасса о нравах времён правления древнеримского императора Калигулы, вошедшего в историю беспримерной жестокостью, коварством и пороками. Фильм субсидировался порноимперией «Пентхаус», отсюда и скандально непристойный характер некоторых сцен, из-за которых автор сценария Гор Видал снял своё имя из титров, а борцы за нравственность (особенно в Ватикане) называли его «отвратительным, позорным хламом».
«Что стоит человек который захватил мир, но при этом потерял свою душу»
С этой цитаты из Библии начинается этот фильм.
И еще один мощный, хлесткий и эффектный фильм от этого режиссера (раньше я дал рецензию на «Черного ангела»). Тинто Брасс очень любопытен именно в таком роде кино. Остальное у него чистая порнуха, причем среднего содержания (не задело). Основой сценария стали сочетания классических трудов Тацита и Светония («Жизнь 12 Цезарей»). И та и другая работы – откровенно сатирического содержания, местами опиравшиеся на анекдоты, слухи и домыслы. Например, ключевой момент – никто при жизни Гая Цезаря «Калигулой» (башмачок) не называл. Цезония не была весталкой. Зверское «благословление» Ливии и ее мужа в действительности не было таким страшным (вот тут чисто фантазии сценариста и режиссера). Есть и другие моменты также спорные, но самое спорное это обилие порнухи в кадре, причем часто с участием подростков. И все-таки, стоит заметить, что из всех пеплумов, снятых в то время по теме Древнего Рима, только «Спартак» Стенли Кубрика и «Клеопатра» достигают столь же высокой точности следованию слову первоисточника. Да, как бы это не звучало странно, но так! Пеплумы в целом очень рыхлый жанр с гигантским количеством фантазирования и домысливания. На их фоне данный фильм смотрится вполне убедительно. Где-то 55-60% показанного на экране действительно имело место быть. Кстати обелиск Калигулы до сих пор стоит перед собором Святого Петра и римский папа на него смотрит. Вот он:
Сильные его стороны, это общее настроение кризиса и перелома в обществе, показанные довольно убедительно. Далее конечно декорации и одежда персонажей, ну и конечно безупречная актерская игра, особенно главного героя в исполнении Малкольма Макдауэлла.
Сюжет
Будущий император Гай Юлий Цезарь Август Германик (Калигула) вступает в борьбу за Римский престол со своим дядей (показан дедушкой) Тиберием (Питер О’Тул), действуя лестью и хитростью. Постоянное ожидание расправы со стороны Тиберия окончательно подрывает и без того хрупкую психику Калигулы. Он собственноручно пытается убить Тиберия во время припадка, но в итоге за него убийство совершает префект преторианских когорт Макрон (что соответствует истории). Калигула становится принципом, затем избавляется и от Макрона и от прямого наследника Тиберия – Гимелия (первого арестовывают за убийство Тиберия, а второго за попытку принять противоядие – что также полностью соответствует фактам).
Затем Гай Цезарь погружается в пространство абсолютной власти. В этйо страсти ему еще помогает официальная супруга — Цезония (Хелен Миррен), которая вскоре ему рожает дочь (что также соответствует фактам). Но Калигула мечтает о браке с сестрой Друзилой (Тереза Энн Савой) и даже думает перенести столищу в Египет, где подобное разрешено для фараонов, что Друзилла отвергает (и это соответствует фактам). Разгульная жизнь, бессмысленная жестокость, непредсказуемость и массовые конфискации имущества нобилей настраивают сенаторов и знать против Калигулы. Сам он сходит с ума, после смерти своей сестры Друзиллы от «лихорадки».
Убивает Калигулу назначенный им же новый префект Преторианцев Кассий Херея, на выходе из двора. При этом Калигула произносит реальные исторические слова: «я еще жив!», на что Херея отвечает: «закончить дело!».
Единственный момент, который тут выпадает, это то что Херея тут же вытаскивает Клавдия, которого провозглашают новым Цезарем. В действительности убийцы мечтали о восстановлении сенаторского правления и были противниками принципата.
В фильме два порнографических момента, которые частично соответствуют истории, это:
- «Дом наслаждений на Капри» Тиберия, где наряду с рабами были и юные граждане Рима и Теберий вправду называл их «мои рыбки».
- Публичный дом, открытый Калигулой в центре Рима. Но в действительности там работали не жены сенаторов, а простые граждане Рима, которым заниматься таким делом по законам было запрещено.
В остальном почти все, даже фраза «Тиберия в Тибр», прозвучавшая в сенате в день инаугурации Гая Цезаря – правда.
Фильм эффектный, стильный мощный, а игра Майкла Магдаулла – бесподобная, и даже скажу – «иступленная». Он так хорошо сыграл Калигулу, что после этого его принимали лишь на роли антагонистов и самых отъявленных злодеев.
Даже у нас в России он успел сыграть Юровского и Чикатило. Фильм можно посмотреть ради одного этого. Кроме того в фильме отличная музыка, идеально ложащаяся на предельно закрученный драматизмом сюжет и неплохие, пусть и чисто театральные декорации. Губит фильм обилие порнухи в кадре. У меня даже была мысль вырезать ее всю из кино, поскольку на сюжет это действие никак не влияет. И тут момент, сам Тинто Брасс был против затаскивания в фильм такого большого объема порно. И это все закачали уже после того, как самого режиссера отстранили от съемок. Есть и сокращенная версия, но там выпали не только порнографические сцены, но и многие сюжетные события, без которых многое стало непонятным. В общем, рекомендую посмотреть фильм полностью, но если вы слишком сентиментальный человек и у вас слишком тонкий высокий вкус… то смотрите сокращенную.
В любом случае не пожалеете, поскольку действие на экране удивляет своей необузданной энергией, трагедизом и даже мощью.